Help
With one of my partners I play both. The convention card has both listed and we provide full disclosure. I was told that because of the ambiguity it is not allowed. I did not know that nor do I believe it. If you know the laws and rules please let me know.
Page 1 of 1
Rusinow + coded 10's and 9's combine the two systems
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,693
- Joined: 2006-April-17
- Gender:Male
- Location:Rochester, NY
Posted 2017-May-12, 18:39
In what jurisdiction?
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2017-May-12, 21:40
So, if you lead a J, 10 or a 9, what does it mean?
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,703
- Joined: 2006-May-18
- Gender:Not Telling
Posted 2017-May-15, 07:59
I assume you want to play the following:-
K: strong, asking for unblock/count
Q: KQx(x)
J: AQJx(x), QJx(x)
T: AJTx(x), KJTx(x), JTx(x), Tx
9: AT9x(x), KT9x(x), QT9x(x), AKT9(x), AQT9(x), 9x
Or possibly with JTx(x) moved up to the J row instead. I cannot immediately think of any jurisdiction where this would be disallowed - could you tell us where and under which regulation.
K: strong, asking for unblock/count
Q: KQx(x)
J: AQJx(x), QJx(x)
T: AJTx(x), KJTx(x), JTx(x), Tx
9: AT9x(x), KT9x(x), QT9x(x), AKT9(x), AQT9(x), 9x
Or possibly with JTx(x) moved up to the J row instead. I cannot immediately think of any jurisdiction where this would be disallowed - could you tell us where and under which regulation.
(-: Zel :-)
Page 1 of 1