BBO Discussion Forums: Congratulations - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Congratulations Daylongs

#1 User is offline   pilowsky 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,765
  • Joined: 2019-October-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Poland

Posted 2022-September-09, 01:02

Just wanted to congratulate Benczek18 (87.01%) who defeated benczek17(84.59%) to come 1st in the most recent daylong.
I'm sure that with practice the other 7 Benczekxx's that played will be able to join 18 on the podium.
Interestingly Benczek33 (who managed only 70.66%) was not joined by the other Beczekxx's who were a no show on this occasion.

I understand the argument for using a large deal pool as an anti-cheating measure.
I am also aware that BBO is able to detect when different names are coming from the same IP address (it is stated that BBO$ are not awarded in the free Sunday tourney when multiple entries come from the same IP address).

Can I suggest an improvement in BBO's fair play measures so that where multiple IP addresses are detected in a tournament, only the lowest score stands.

Otherwise, what's the point of bothering at all.
Fortuna Fortis Felix
4

#2 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,033
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-September-09, 02:21

A moment of silence for poor benczek11, who is the only number less than 34 that failed to even exist :(
2

#3 User is offline   johnu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,033
  • Joined: 2008-September-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-September-09, 04:31

Special thanks to the anonymous "Palooka" family for playing like patzers so that the benczek family could do as well as it did.
1

#4 User is offline   LBengtsson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2017-August-10
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-September-09, 06:09

The easiest way for BBO to deal with this is ban the users IP addresses. It is a obvious dupe. They cannot register as other users on the computers they use, and so will soon run out of terminals or phones to access. It is a simple and effective solution, so why cannot BBO do this?
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users