2/1 , 2♣ gf with clubs.
And another 3136
#1
Posted 2021-August-09, 02:10
2/1 , 2♣ gf with clubs.
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#2
Posted 2021-August-09, 02:29
I'd probably start with 3♦ or 3♥ (we don't tend to limit our splinters) in your auction. Not sure whether I'd have started with a SJS 3♣ if I played more standard SJSs than I do.
#3
Posted 2021-August-09, 02:58
#4
Posted 2021-August-09, 03:11
mw64ahw, on 2021-August-09, 02:58, said:
You're not very well placed to know which of 6♦/6N you want to be in yet, can you distinguish between QJxx, Axx, AQxxx, x where 6N won't make on a heart lead but 6♦ is cold if they break (and 6♣ is even better) and other hands where 6N is cold, also you don't know whether it's your ♠Kxx or partner's hypothetical ♥AQx or Kxx that needs protecting.
#5
Posted 2021-August-09, 03:48
As an aside, in my weak (12-14) NT partnership we only rebid 2♦ with 6(+) here, and will rebid a 4-card major even without extras. This gives some flexibility in exploring 3NT/5m, because three suits will have been bid naturally already. So far we haven't had any disasters. Depending on the South hand this might be very helpful.
#6
Posted 2021-August-09, 04:02
Cyberyeti, on 2021-August-09, 03:11, said:
You're correct-I'm expecting to be in 6♦, but if partner can bid beyond 5♥ immediately then I look to convert to 6NT
#7
Posted 2021-August-09, 08:31
There are two considerations: from which side to play it and who knows about the slam potential?
It is difficult to get partner on board with minimum values and to understand there are 6 club tricks available . I am going to start with 3D as supporting a minor suit should by itself hint at slam aspirations. I don’t like splinter because partner will not understand that xx, AQJ, AQxxxx, xx is golden for 6 clubs.
I also think there is a good argument for bidding 3C and then supporting diamonds .
Either way it is important to uncover what type hand partner holds. Qx, AQJ, QJxxxx, xx is consistent with the bidding.
#8
Posted 2021-August-09, 10:10
Winstonm, on 2021-August-09, 08:31, said:
agree. supporting ♦ could lead to a 6♦ contract when 6NT from your side would be preferable. the ♦ support can wait. it is important to find out if partner has a 6 card ♦ suit or a 4 card major here. you should be in charge of the auction after partners 2♦. I think the worst can happen is that you arrive in 5♦ when 3NT makes with overtricks if playing match points.
#9
Posted 2021-August-09, 10:59
LBengtsson, on 2021-August-09, 10:10, said:
Agreeing diamonds may allow you to find ♦Q when it's more difficult if you don't.
#10
Posted 2021-August-09, 11:17
If you raise ♦, (my choice) partner makes a cooperative 3♥ bid, values, could be 4 hearts, 5+ diamonds.
Winstonm, on 2021-August-09, 08:31, said:
Right! Here I am with SIX tricks in my hand, a King in partners suit, shortness and the ♠K which could come in handy too. I'm going to be the one driving this auction.
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#11
Posted 2021-August-09, 12:06
jillybean, on 2021-August-09, 11:17, said:
If you raise ♦, (my choice) partner makes a cooperative 3♥ bid, values, could be 4 hearts, 5+ diamonds.
At this point I will not allow the hand to be played in less than 4NT so I bid 3S. If partner follows with 3N I will continue with 4C. If this spurs a heart cue bid I would then use whatever keycard convention is available.
#12
Posted 2021-August-09, 21:31
Half the field got caught in 3nt while others played in ♦s.
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#13
Posted 2021-August-09, 21:42
jillybean, on 2021-August-09, 21:31, said:
Half the field got caught in 3nt while others played in ♦s.
Note that the worthless doubletons scream that for slam purposes partner should declare.
#14
Posted 2021-August-09, 21:47
Winstonm, on 2021-August-09, 21:42, said:
Yes, protecting the ♠K
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#16
Posted 2021-August-10, 02:44
Gilithin, on 2021-August-09, 21:54, said:
The problem in many systems is with a 4441 in your 1N opening range as a 2N rebid shows a different strength, I see no alternative to 1♦-2♣-2♦ with a 13 count playing weak NT without 2/1 GF unless you're prepared to open 1♥ and admit to a 5th heart you don't have by rebidding 2♦.
I'm not sure exactly what the 2N rebid shows in 2/1 and whether you can disentangle the range if it matches what you open 1N on.
#18
Posted 2021-August-10, 04:07
#19
Posted 2021-August-10, 04:25
Gilithin, on 2021-August-09, 21:54, said:
#20
Posted 2021-August-10, 07:12
Gilithin, on 2021-August-09, 21:54, said:
Justin Lall convinced me that it is ok to rebid nt with a singleton. The only opening scheme I ever used was the 2D opening in Sontag/Weichsel version of Precision.
I personally think it a mistake to create alterations to your basic bidding structure to handle low frequency hands. This fits with my thinking that 2/1 is built for game/slam bidding so you accept that part score bidding will not be as accurate . 1nt forcing is integral to 2/1 so to change it to semi-forcing alters the entire structure of other bids. I think this is a mistake . If you want to be able to bid non-forcing 1nt, don’t play 2/1.
JillyBean 'Here's the full hand and auction,
Half the field got caught in 3nt while others played in ♦s.
++++++++++++++++++
As the cards lie, 3N works better than 6♦; but luckier views (as suggested by other commentators) get you to the excellent 6♣ or 6N.