BBO Discussion Forums: Problem Psyche (EBU) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Problem Psyche (EBU)

#21 User is offline   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,429
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted 2021-February-12, 09:54

If you say "it's obvious" and partner doesn't scream, you have an agreement. You may have never specifically discussed it, but you have one.

I know, it's hard to decide, and it's hard to not get caught by it. But there are those with 5 years and 1500 MPs worth of experience as partners who have a lot of scenarios where they have "no agreement" because they've "never discussed it" - deliberately (whether it's because they don't "have to" disclose it, or because it might not be legal, doesn't matter). And the regulators have to be able to deal with that.
When I go to sea, don't fear for me, Fear For The Storm -- Birdie and the Swansong (tSCoSI)
0

#22 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,693
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2021-February-12, 14:12

There's hypotheses, and there's cases. With the hypothesis that an experienced pair may have an implicit agreement I agree. But the evidence in the OP does not support the idea that the hypothesis applies to this case.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users