kenberg, on 2018-June-26, 13:04, said:
The NYT posted above suggests
"Helping these nations stabilize themselves is key to reducing the flow of asylum seekers"
Suppose this was developed from a suggestion to a plan, open for discussion.
Could it be, as I think it could, that some people with concerns about immigration would say "Sounds like it might be worth a try"?
These some people might be a mix of Rs and Ds. The basis would be on two points:
1. The situation for many people is horrible, something must be done
2. Having 30 million or so people who now live in Honduras, El Salvador or Guatemala move to the USA might be a solution, but maybe we could do better.
I am not suggesting Donald Trump would like this idea. Or even that he would be willing to give it some thought. The man does tweets, slurs and confrontations, thinking is not his style. I am suggesting that it might be a start on a viable solution that would have broad support. I am not saying it would be easy. I am not saying that it is the only thing we must do. While we are waiting for this miracle, we need to address the problems of the here and now. I am not claiming I have the answers. But I am suggesting that we get beyond expressions of horror and defiance to see if we might actually be able to do some things that would help.
We are reaching the point where we do not look for good ideas. We don't listen. We fight. Total war is sometimes necessary but it is always very destructive.
I agree that something positive should be done. I agree I don't know what that something should be. I agree that it needs to be a bipartisan solution - maybe even multi-partisan with international cooperation.
I do not think Dennison will allow this to happen as it would make him look and seem "weak". Without a commanding change in the makeup of the Senate and House, there is no way to override a veto.
We are stuck with Dennison - and the only way to deal with a demagogue is to outlast him. And resist in the meantime. Salvaging the remnants of the republic from the destructive force of demagoguery to me seems more important than immigration solutions. I wish it were not so.