Google has beaten Go, what could it do to bridge?
#61
Posted 2016-March-15, 06:22
Congratulations to Google AlphaGo team ! Hats off to DeepMind founder Demis Hassabis !
1- Li kaifu thinks the thinking ability of AlphaGo on playing Go is stronger than human.
2- Almost of the professional Go champions admit AlphaGo's skill is stronger than human.
3- I think DeepMind founder Demis Hassabis, UK scientist, should obtain the Nobel Prize.
In weibo, more than one hundred million people are paying attention to the event. Some players are hoping that AlpfaGo may come out unexpectedly bug again, great pity that AlpfaGo never give any chance to human.
All the professional Go players of China are looking forword to play against AlphaGo. Our chinese desire is Welcome AlphaGo and Demis Hassabis to China !
VS
#62
Posted 2016-March-15, 06:22
Lycier, while I understand your nationalistic pride, I really don't think Ke Jie will fare any differently.
-gwnn
#65
Posted 2016-March-15, 07:38
lycier, on 2016-March-15, 06:48, said:
Perhaps I misunderstood. Your are in China, you sound like a big fan of China's current top player Ke Jie, and seem to believe him decisively superior to both Lee Sedol and AlphaGo.
At any rate, he is a professional, and so I expect he will play AlphaGo for the right price ... which is likely to be higher than Lee's. Time will tell.
-gwnn
#66
Posted 2016-March-15, 08:20
billw55, on 2016-March-15, 06:22, said:
Having not played go since university, I could not say what the tactics were either but his comments suggest he played in an unconventional way and that was enough to throw the computer off in Game 4. For Game 5, either he was unable to reproduce the same type of position or the coding team adjusted the program to compensate. The unconventional play is the equivalent of "anti-computer tactics" in chess, which basically means creating positions that are as boring as possible. The other tactic from chess was long-term positional sacrifices such as the Benko Gambit. These methods will sometimes allow a very strong player to draw against a computer but it has been a long time since a human has won a multi-game match against a chess computer. By anaology, I would expect there to be similar kinks in the armour of AlphaGo for some time, generally in unusual positions where the usual rules are not helpful. Lee seems to have stumbled on such a weakness and I would expect the strongest Chinese players to get together now to analyse how they can best exploit that for the inevitable match that will follow.
#67
Posted 2016-March-15, 09:13
billw55, on 2016-March-15, 07:38, said:
At any rate, he is a professional, and so I expect he will play AlphaGo for the right price ... which is likely to be higher than Lee's. Time will tell.
When we know AlphaGo Vs South Korea Lee sedol, all the people of China,Japan and South Korea are very shocked, all the peoples are very excited.
In fact, in South Korea, peoples pay close attention to this event more than to their presidential election.
In China, too many people also pay close attention to this event with over one hundred million.
For us, this is a great event,more interesting than concern with affairs of state. That's to say that a person without passion isn't real fans, just like USA NBA..
Assume AlphaBridge overcome the bridge champions team, I believe Europeans and americans also are very very excited, just like us.
So I think DeepMind founder Demis Hassabis, UK scientist, should obtain the Nobel Prize.
#68
Posted 2016-March-15, 09:19
billw55, on 2016-March-15, 07:38, said:
At any rate, he is a professional, and so I expect he will play AlphaGo for the right price ... which is likely to be higher than Lee's. Time will tell.
Our professional Go champions think we maybe have a chance to overcome AlphaGo due to its weakness at present, however after 5 months to 12 months, no one have ability to overcome AlphaGo !
#69
Posted 2016-March-15, 09:54
lycier, on 2016-March-15, 09:13, said:
Wow, you definitely have passion about this!
-gwnn
#72
Posted 2016-March-15, 16:29
Further, part of what's exciting from an AI standpoint is that AlphaGo is built on a very general machine learning framework. There isn't really human "expert knowledge" being hard coded in the way most chess programs have. This means even if they wanted to "adjust the program" between games there isn't really a way to do that.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#73
Posted 2016-March-15, 17:39
#74
Posted 2016-March-15, 19:00
AlphaGo won $1 million bonuses, lee se-dol got $170,000 appearance fees and bonuses.
AlphaGo Vs human war be impressive ,now it seems it is impossible for human to overcome AlphaGo, American technology is too strong, too terrible. AI will shape the future of human.
#78
Posted 2016-March-16, 06:00
jogs, on 2016-March-15, 17:39, said:
The Japanese professionals were the strongest for a very long time, from the 1600s until about the early 1990s. Then the Koreans overtook them and the Chinese not long after.
-gwnn
#79
Posted 2016-March-16, 20:17
Now some Go champions think :
1- AlphaGo only shows about professional 6 duan skill in the beginning stage of layout.
2- ALphaGo miraculously owns about professional 13-15 duan skill in the intermediate stage,(the highest level of human skill is 9 duan.) far more than world Go champions, its precise calculation ability is far more than human, especially the most worthy of admiration is its " Overall Situation Assessing " is too good,really great, better than human !
3- Local processing ability is often worse than human.
4- All the Go champions know AlphaGo has great ability to improve their skill rapidly.They like it very much.
5- Only after several years in the future , if DeepMind team is willing to develop AlphfaGo , AlphaGo will have its own Go theory for sure, we 100% believe AlphaGo be Go god for sure, that is to say AlphaGo will have great ability to teach world Go champions " How To Play Go correctly " !!!
So I have to say how strong AlphaGo is,how terrible Google technology ! Hats off to AlphaGo !
This is my feeling.
Thanks to everyone, especially to the "OP".
#80
Posted 2016-March-17, 00:56
lycier, on 2016-March-15, 10:06, said:
Yes this is true... Alphago may retire but AI in general wlll live on.
thousands and thousands of years from now AI will live on.
Ancenters
-----
Humans can and do evolve along with machines.
For some reason many forbid evolution.
--------
genes are selfish
------------
genes jump species.