Help
P ? X ? 1♠ ? 1N ?
Man, mouse or fruitbat
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,934
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2015-October-24, 08:34
P ? X ? 1♠ ? 1N ?
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 15,390
- Joined: 2003-February-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:Natick, MA
-
Interests:Travel
Cooking
Brewing
Hiking
Posted 2015-October-24, 08:43
Cyberyeti, on 2015-October-24, 08:34, said:
P ? X ? 1♠ ? 1N ?
Make me down for a pass.
The spade suit is way too weak for a 4 card overcall.
I have more than enough strength for a double, but I can't stomach a 2♦ advance.
Too weak for 1NT
Alderaan delenda est
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,076
- Joined: 2009-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:Kent (Near London)
Posted 2015-October-24, 09:58
Pass. In tempo.
#4
- Group: Members
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 2015-September-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-October-24, 10:13
Cheese!
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,366
- Joined: 2012-March-18
- Gender:Male
- Location:Illinois
- Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer
Posted 2015-October-24, 11:55
Pass.
If it goes 1 ♥ - P - P - ?, I'm depending on partner to balance with any reasonable bid. If not, we probably haven't missed much.
If responder makes a call, we are probably better off out of the auction with this K oriented hand.
If it goes 1 ♥ - P - P - ?, I'm depending on partner to balance with any reasonable bid. If not, we probably haven't missed much.
If responder makes a call, we are probably better off out of the auction with this K oriented hand.
#6
- Csaba the Hutt
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,027
- Joined: 2006-June-16
- Gender:Male
- Location:Göttingen, Germany
- Interests:bye
Posted 2015-October-24, 12:04
x
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#7
- Andy Bowles
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 11,993
- Joined: 2007-May-03
- Gender:Male
- Location:London, UK
Posted 2015-October-24, 12:07
Double seems normal, even in England. 1♠ and 1NT make me feel ill.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#8
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2015-October-24, 12:47
1NT, and no reservations.
HCP analysis assumes unknowns. When you expect heavy values to your right, honors grow up. Kings and tenaces take more tricks than usual, because hooks work more than usual. This hand is loaded with positional under-evaluation if you just count HCP.
HCP analysis assumes unknowns. When you expect heavy values to your right, honors grow up. Kings and tenaces take more tricks than usual, because hooks work more than usual. This hand is loaded with positional under-evaluation if you just count HCP.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#9
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 354
- Joined: 2012-February-25
- Gender:Male
- Location:Birmingham,UK
Posted 2015-October-24, 13:58
Clear double
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,080
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2015-October-24, 16:40
Pass or Double. Being all white, Double.
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#11
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 648
- Joined: 2010-October-27
- Gender:Male
- Location:San Bernardino, CA USA
Posted 2015-October-24, 22:58
P > 1NT > X > 1♠
#12
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2015-October-25, 03:12
kenrexford, on 2015-October-24, 12:47, said:
1NT, and no reservations.
HCP analysis assumes unknowns. When you expect heavy values to your right, honors grow up. Kings and tenaces take more tricks than usual, because hooks work more than usual. This hand is loaded with positional under-evaluation if you just count HCP.
HCP analysis assumes unknowns. When you expect heavy values to your right, honors grow up. Kings and tenaces take more tricks than usual, because hooks work more than usual. This hand is loaded with positional under-evaluation if you just count HCP.
Yeah specially ♦KQ grow up a lot, assming RHO will duck twice when we play the suit form dummy with the many entries we have, and later we will play towards our kings as well.
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,866
- Joined: 2008-July-13
Posted 2015-October-25, 03:34
x looks entirely normal. lol at 1nt.
#14
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 878
- Joined: 2009-June-28
- Gender:Male
- Location:Australia
Posted 2015-October-25, 07:35
Automatic double for me.
It might have 15 HCP, but its certainly not worth 15 HCP!
It might have 15 HCP, but its certainly not worth 15 HCP!
#15
- AQT92 AQ --- QJ6532
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,840
- Joined: 2009-September-09
- Gender:Male
- Location:Wellington, NZ
Posted 2015-October-25, 09:17
WesleyC, on 2015-October-25, 07:35, said:
Automatic double for me.
It might have 15 HCP, but its certainly not worth 15 HCP!
It might have 15 HCP, but its certainly not worth 15 HCP!
It has 14 HCP. (But it isn't worth that either.)
I'll pass - it's close to an X but the hand is just so bad. Maybe I shouldn't wimp out and just go for it NV though.
ahydra
#16
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 274
- Joined: 2015-February-11
- Gender:Male
- Location:Ireland
Posted 2015-October-25, 09:49
Pass in tempo.
A bad 14 (don't like KQ doubleton) and wretched intermediates. In addition to which, two diamonds from P is the last thing you want to hear.
If partner balances, however, it's a totally different proposition.
D.
A bad 14 (don't like KQ doubleton) and wretched intermediates. In addition to which, two diamonds from P is the last thing you want to hear.
If partner balances, however, it's a totally different proposition.
D.
#17
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,831
- Joined: 2011-June-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK Near London
- Interests:Crystal Palace
Posted 2015-October-25, 10:05
Auto x
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
#18
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 397
- Joined: 2014-February-23
- Gender:Male
- Location:Germany
Posted 2015-October-25, 16:20
I wouldn't mind if my partner passed with this, but I would double to show the points and the 4-card ♠. It would feel much better with ♦7 instead of ♥7, or course, but I believe it should turn out right more often than wrong.
Give me at least ♥J instead of ♥7, and I will think about 1NT.
1♠ never, promises 5 cards. Would I want a ♠ lead that desperately with this hand?
Give me at least ♥J instead of ♥7, and I will think about 1NT.
1♠ never, promises 5 cards. Would I want a ♠ lead that desperately with this hand?
#19
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,576
- Joined: 2009-May-18
- Location:Oz
Posted 2015-October-25, 16:36
I used to pass with these, but have now been converted to the view that double is a clear winning strategy in the 21st century. You lose way too many part score battles by passing.
#20
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 13,934
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2015-October-25, 17:27
Our style with this point count and shape is to overcall 1♠, but I hate the quality of the spade suit, KQ10x, Kxx, Kx, Kxxx I'd overcall 1♠ automatically. I wasn't faced with this problem, I was the partner of the opening bidder. My team mate passed and the auction arrived in 4♥= pretty quickly. At my table the auction went 1♥-(X)-2N(4 card raise to 3 or better)-(3♠)-4♥-(4♠) and the partner of the hand I gave had Qxxxxx, x, xxx, xxx so when we didn't lead a club from AQx we could only collect 50 for a 9 IMP loss.