cherdano, on 2015-September-28, 16:44, said:
Yet James Blake wouldn't have gotten tackled and treated they way he was treated if he had been white. And that kind of incident happens hundreds of times every day in the US.
I agree people are all individuals, and there are very few people where the word "racist" is helpful in describing their personality.
But when you are talking about the entire US society, then there are many phenomena that cannot be explained fully without talking about racism. Insisting that it is inappropriate to be brought up in discussion, equating it with "name-calling" etc., is just completely inappropriate. Yes, it's the easy and comfortable thing to do when you are part of the majority race. You don't want to have to wonder whether your proverbial "uncle" actually is a racist, or just says racists things now and then. But it is completely disrespectful to about 112 million Americans.
I hope this isn't read as a personal attack on Ken. Everybody reading the watercooler knows he is a much better human being than I. But here he is, in my view, very very wrong. And he is wrong about one of the most important questions affecting US society as a whole.
Actually, I like what you say here, and I will think about it some. Maybe just a starter comment or two.
People seem to group themselves by race, but not exclusively. In the bar I mentioned above, owned by a black guy I knew, I did not go back. It was pretty clear that my presence was not desired by several others there. Nothing really hostile, but I came in to enjoy myself not to make any sort of statement about brotherhood, and I did not much enjoy it. I wasn't wanted, so I did not return.(The owner was fine with me, and not just because I was a customer, but some of his customers not so much so.) People seek comfort, I was made uncomfortable. I could cope, but why should I. It is more pleasant to go where people greet me as if they are glad to see me.
This bar owner was once speaking of his sister to me. She got a degree in education and got a job in northern Minnesota. He drove her up there. In his words "We drove for miles and miles and I didn't even see a black face". This concerned him. He said it was all going ok as far as he knew. I didn't ask if his sister had a boyfriend, someone she might wish to marry. Perhaps so, but maybe tough. [This was forty years ago, maybe the world has changed. Or not.]
So we have a problem. The following will not entirely solve it, but it might lessen the effects.
Here is one recommendation. We improve the educational system for those in poor communities. Note that I did not say in black communities, Probably no one disagrees with that suggestion. But I have a few twists.
1. There are so many glaring deficiencies that we could easily find things to do. Perfection is not needed, substantial improvement is.
2. We stop discussing achievement gaps based on race. Some kids do better than others, that cannot be helped, but we do our best.
3. We apportion responsibility. Society has the responsibility to make good choices available. Some people will make bad choices. I have made some bad choices, I blame no one but myself. If we make good choices available, we do not accept the responsibility for the bad choices some will make.
4. We accept that the young need guidance and that, if possible, they should be given an opportunity to recover from their errors. But they have a responsibility to recognize that they have made an error.
I understand that this sounds like I hope for people to accept my general world view instead of the work view that might be offered by their neighborhood. That's true. And I know that this is often derided. Well, a choice has to be made.
I have suggested, only partly in jest, that every 8 year old should be issued a bicycle and it should (this is probably the jesting part) be a capital offense to steal it. The idea is that a kid can get out and explore the world, and make choices. Becky mentioned an article to me the other day that said they were having bicycle classes in school in one of the poor areas of the city. Maybe someone was listening to me. Nah. But I rode my bike everywhere, and I regard it as an important part of my growth.
Some choices are better than others. There is no getting around that. I favor much improved opportunity to make better choices, and acceptance that some will make bad choices.
I think most all of this could be done without ever saying the word race.
I know others approach this differently.
Added: I have not addressed police relations. I accept that some things are not right. I favor fixing this. But I also recognize that my total (well, almost total) lack of experience is a problem when it comes to making a reasonable suggestion. Most everyone has an agenda, and about 90% of them have no more of an idea than I do about what would be helpful.