Something we presented our opponents with this afternoon.
What would you assume X and 2N meant over a very old style precision 2♦ (4414/4405 11-15) without discussion ?
What methods would you play if you had discussed it ?
Page 1 of 1
Decent advanced partner assumptions not specifically discussed
#2
Posted 2015-March-29, 16:21
Ideal: X should be a takeout double of clubs. 2NT should just be 15-18 hcp balanced as usual with some stops.
With a random partner I'd assume X meant an opening hand with diamonds and 2NT as above.
With some partners I'd assume X meant 12-14 balanced ish or a very strong hand.
With a random partner I'd assume X meant an opening hand with diamonds and 2NT as above.
With some partners I'd assume X meant 12-14 balanced ish or a very strong hand.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2015-March-29, 16:27
Double=15+ balanced or strong over call.
2N=minors
2M natural overcall.
2N=minors
2M natural overcall.
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
#4
Posted 2015-March-29, 23:48
We haven't found a need to get active with takeout doubles in Direct seat when we already know that suits will be breaking badly for us. Double to show a balanced 15+ and consider defending seems to work well -- with a direct 2NT reserved for a nice trick-taker.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#5
Posted 2015-March-30, 00:40
These days many people include 3415/4315 also in 2D so things are not guaranteed to break badly. You're losing out of a cheap way of describing your hands with shortish clubs if you are going to keep your doubles so strong.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#6
Posted 2015-March-30, 01:34
gwnn, on 2015-March-30, 00:40, said:
These days many people include 3415/4315 also in 2D so things are not guaranteed to break badly. You're losing out of a cheap way of describing your hands with shortish clubs if you are going to keep your doubles so strong.
Cyber gave us the disclosure for the thread...4-4-1-4 or 4-4-0-5. I was discussing that, and don't think I will change our partnership agreements over the Precision 2D just in case they have given misinformation.
And yes, we have different methods over less disciplined 2D 3- suit openings, but they are not in play here.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#7
Posted 2015-March-30, 01:46
Oh OK. I also saw that it was specifically 4414/4405 but thought that most people would have the same agreements over both (I would definitely do). Anyway I would stick to the same agreements over both. If partner doesn't want to play against a 4-1 split he can go ahead and start penalizing them. I don't think they can sit in 2♦x too often.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2015-March-30, 09:55
OK, I'll now give you the problem opps had at table:
X was undiscussed
X was undiscussed
#9
Posted 2015-April-01, 13:16
if double was undiscussed probably 4nt now is undiscussed as well.
I bid 5♦, hoping p takes my double the way I meant it.
I bid 5♦, hoping p takes my double the way I meant it.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
Page 1 of 1