kgr, on 2015-February-09, 02:56, said:
I added partners hand in the diagram below
Yet another case where 4
♣ minorwood would be helpful.
Quote
It is clear for North to continue to six with the singleton Club?
The singleton was an ace and as I understand 3
♣ in context shows a powerful suit interested in a club slam.
If South required genuine club support he would have rebid 2NT (or perhaps 3
♦) not 3
♣ at least the way I play 2/1.
Over 3
♦ South denied either values in diamonds by refusing to bid 3NT or he must have a huge hand.
He also denied interest in the majors. Where are South values to force to game?
Does North really expect two losers in clubs?
Rainer Herrmann
IMPs; teams
Do you agree with the bidding of this hand? :
2♣ followed by 3♣ is GF;
A direct jump to 3♣ would be 6c♣ with invite values.
5♣ would be to play
3♦ of partner was 4th suit, asking more info.
4♣ denies a ♦-stop, and probably denies 2c♠, 3c♥; 5♣ instead of 4♣ would have been minimal values