BBO Discussion Forums: Help settle an argument :) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Help settle an argument :)

Poll: Help settle an argument :) (43 member(s) have cast votes)

Your call?

  1. Pass (2 votes [4.65%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.65%

  2. Double (41 votes [95.35%])

    Percentage of vote: 95.35%

  3. 5H (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  4. 5D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  5. something else (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   the_dude 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 224
  • Joined: 2009-November-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida

Posted 2014-February-10, 05:43

My partner and I vehemently disagreed on the "clear" action with this hand - so I promised I'd post it and let you guys be the arbiters :)

Swiss teams, love all, mediocre opponents


We play unusual vs unusual, 3H is a simple, constructive raise (we play together infrequently so don't have in-depth agreements). Is Souths action clear? if so what?

Thanks in advance for your input.
If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it then how bad a decision could it really be?
0

#2 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2014-February-10, 06:13

Unanimous.
3

#3 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2014-February-10, 07:13

 PhilKing, on 2014-February-10, 06:13, said:

Unanimous.

Well; two of out of three. "Bridge" and "Hand" but not "Interesting".
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#4 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2014-February-10, 07:31

Basic principle 4h is not a sacrifice over 4c--------that means we have entered into a forcing pass

auction. If we pass 5c that means we are willing to continue on over 5c. I doubt anyone would consider

this hand "offensive" in nature vs defensive with about 100% of our values in the opponents long suits.

X here is nothing more than offering an opinion about competing further. Our controls in the minors

might be reasonable if partner had shown slam interest but bidding at the 5 level should be more about is

it safer to play or take the penalty and run. Taking the penalty seems right here. If p was interested in slam

they should have done something aside from 4h.



0

#5 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2014-February-10, 07:36

We seem to have 2 defensive tricks while partner opened and got to game. Double just shows we are minimum with defensive values, partner can still pull it out, in which case 6 would seem like an option, although I wouldn't risk it.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#6 User is offline   the_dude 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 224
  • Joined: 2009-November-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida

Posted 2014-February-10, 07:59

 lamford, on 2014-February-10, 07:13, said:

Well; two of out of three. "Bridge" and "Hand" but not "Interesting".


Sorry - I only post because partner was so vehement that X was wrong and I promised I'd ask you guys here to settle it...

The full hand:


Partner's argument is that South is too good to X, North was on his way to bidding 5H but the X caused him to back off. I think X is clear.

Thanks again all for your input.
If no one comes from the future to stop you from doing it then how bad a decision could it really be?
0

#7 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,512
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2014-February-10, 08:08

Although I would not dble 5C I can not say I feel ddle is a poor choice as responder. I know this is a F pass situation, not sure I want to put on the brakes with dble. I doubt partner is looking for slam when they did nothing over 4C and my hand is not so offensive in nature, but it may not produce a wealth of defense either. I like pass.
0

#8 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-February-10, 12:26

Best defense is a strong offence and North dropped the ball by bidding a mere 4 and then expecting you to cater to a slammish hand?

4 can respect a sign off and 4 if you can't do that in your style does have some risk but not much.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#9 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2014-February-10, 13:31

When partner bid 4, slam was no longer an issue. Besides, do you really want to be in slam on these cards?

The South hand should double 5. I don't think this is close. South's values are good on both offense and defense. If all North needs is two tricks to make 5, he is probably bidding again.
0

#10 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2014-February-10, 13:41

Whoever thinks this is a FP either plays FP with the worst agreements or don't know what 3 meant (or 3 is their stronger raise). Regardless though, FP or not you dbl with S hand, period.

1-Pd bidding 4 does not mean we had a solid 4. Particularly in distributional hands if he thought we had a small chance to make game and even if we can not make it could still be better than 4 he will bid 4. In this auction 4 does not set up a FP.

2-We have no reason to think they are saving, just because they bid 5 over 4. It could make sense if they previously sit on 4 and then bid 5 over our 4. How do we know E was not about to bid 5, had our pd passed ?

3- Pd did not show any interest in slam whatsoever previous round. How can S who made a limit bid, weakest raise of all fit showing bids (pretty much equal to 1-2), possibly decide that he is in FP auction ?

Most shocking reply to me is the one that says "I would not dbl 5" Jesus!

You showed something like 6-9 hcp (apprx) and you have 2 defensive tricks, both of them in opponent suits, behind the suit holder, and only 3 card support to pd, a balanced hand and pd opened 1 first seat and you would not DBL 5 ?
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





4

#11 User is offline   mfa1010 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 796
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen, Denmark

Posted 2014-February-10, 13:42

 the_dude, on 2014-February-10, 07:59, said:

Partner's argument is that South is too good to X, North was on his way to bidding 5H but the X caused him to back off. I think X is clear.


South may be too good to just bid 3. After 5 there is no force, so the limited hand can't be too good, X just shows good defense.
Michael Askgaard
0

#12 User is offline   monikrazy 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 153
  • Joined: 2012-October-18

Posted 2014-February-10, 18:12

3H and double both seem very reasonable

This is the type of hand where it seems like we would greatly prefer a negative double to show spades (treating it like 4 card without a top honor) but playing unusual vs unusual 3H is slight underbid and 3d slight overbid. Odds are that partner has something helpful opposite in spades with E showing the minors.

Edit: Also would tend to agree that this is not a forcing pass, mainly because the 2NT range can be very wide here and we do not know that ops are trying to sacrifice.
0

#13 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2014-February-11, 02:31

 ArtK78, on 2014-February-10, 13:31, said:

South's values are good on both offense and defense.

I differ, K will normaly be useless on offence. Also Jxx is a very bad offensive holding
0

#14 User is offline   HighLow21 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 781
  • Joined: 2012-January-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-February-20, 12:01

Wait. Why try to take 11 tricks rather than 3+? When all of your high cards are in righty's suit? Against a bad split in diamonds and with 3 poorish trumps? Double is clear as day.
There is a big difference between a good decision and a good result. Let's keep our posts about good decisions rather than "gotcha" results!
0

#15 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2014-February-25, 04:16

"People do not grow, they just learn how to act in public"<br style="color: rgb(142, 142, 142); font-size: 11px; line-height: 13px; background-color: rgb(248, 248, 248);"><br style="color: rgb(142, 142, 142); font-size: 11px; line-height: 13px; background-color: rgb(248, 248, 248);">"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity is boundless" <br style="color: rgb(142, 142, 142); font-size: 11px; line-height: 13px; background-color: rgb(248, 248, 248);">
Disclaimer: this post is not intended to offend anyone who spews constant drivel. --PhilKing (I Stole from Arend's sig)

<br style="color: rgb(142, 142, 142); font-size: 11px; line-height: 13px; background-color: rgb(248, 248, 248);">Posted Imageeagles123, on 2014-February-04, 19:22, said:

gosh given your bbf manner would love to see your teaching LOL if i was a novice i'd be running a million miles from you

Next time I also wil add a picture of my Mystère.
Just a joke, not intended to offend....
Bob Herreman
0

#16 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2014-February-25, 04:52

I don't think it's FP situation.
That being said I double as I have a lot of defense and don't want partner to bid 5H.
1

#17 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,208
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2014-February-25, 05:32

 ggwhiz, on 2014-February-10, 12:26, said:

Best defense is a strong offence and North dropped the ball by bidding a mere 4 and then expecting you to cater to a slammish hand?

4 can respect a sign off and 4 if you can't do that in your style does have some risk but not much.


Was just going to post this, and found somebody had beaten me to it.

N should bid 4 not 4. Now pass is forcing, I'm not sure it is after a 4 bid.

What you should do after 4-5 is more interesting, it's a clear double after 4-5.
0

#18 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2014-February-25, 06:58

Agree with majority that this is not a forcing-pass situation but double is better than pass. Had partner bid 4 (last train or whatever) instead of 4, then you might well be in an FP context but double still seems best (in theory).
Agree with Lurpoa about remarks that are deliberately hurtful to individuals. IMO, we shouldn't upvote them, however amusing.
0

#19 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,696
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2014-February-25, 08:12

 nige1, on 2014-February-25, 06:58, said:

Agree with Lurpoa about remarks that are deliberately hurtful to individuals. IMO, we shouldn't upvote them, however amusing.

Is that what the post says? It was a little difficult to decipher with all the tags flying about, especially considering that none of the quotes within it have anything to do with this thread. It was tempting to report it to have a mod tidy it up and move it to the correct thread.
(-: Zel :-)
1

#20 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2014-February-25, 08:39

Dbl and take the money.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users