On one side of the screen S alerted their 2D bid (screening with W) and, when asked, said "undiscussed". W was 2344 and intended 2nt as scrambling.
On the other side of the screen there was no alert of 2D. x of 2D was taken as takeout in context and 2nt as natural in context by E because he understood 2D to be natural or natural-esque.
It later emerged that if 1D had shown 3 cards or more the 2D would have shown 4S6H, which neither of EW volunteered during the auction. After 2NT had been passed by E, N now suggested that 2D was "maybe natural or maybe spades and hearts".
Table result: 2nt-1 with 3D one off DD, practically certain to make in practice (required unusual, DD lead and switch)
Edit: this was in a teams event held in Germany but attended by teams from several countries. I believe we were in EBL land. I am, however, interested in what might happen in other places.
Do you rule? Does it matter what, if anything, E asked N about 2D? Should 2D have been alerted on either side?
This post has been edited by barmar: 2013-May-10, 10:38
Reason for edit: Added hand diagram