BBO Discussion Forums: How light do you balance? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

How light do you balance?

Poll: How light do you balance? (39 member(s) have cast votes)

How close to a balancing 1NT is this?

  1. Obvious bid (1 votes [2.56%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.56%

  2. I might bid (3 votes [7.69%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.69%

  3. I'd do it if I wasnt vul (8 votes [20.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.51%

  4. I wouldn't do it but I thought about it briefly (8 votes [20.51%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.51%

  5. It's a point shy (9 votes [23.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.08%

  6. Even thinking about it is insane (10 votes [25.64%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.64%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2012-July-31, 22:15

Possibly interesting possibly not.

xx
J9xx
A9xx
AJx

Unfavorable vulnerability, matchpoints.

(1D)-P-(P) to you. No special agreements. Expert partner, adequate opponents.
0

#2 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 16,830
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-31, 22:28

as a nonexpert I pass,

balancing is hard for nonexperts.

my second choice is 1nt.
0

#3 User is offline   Yu18772 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 466
  • Joined: 2010-August-31
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Los Angeles

Posted 2012-July-31, 23:13

It is not about "light" - i dont balance because of distribution, two Aces and 2 Jacks are plenty to balance 1m.
Posted ImageYu
Yehudit Hasin

"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
1

#4 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2012-July-31, 23:14

1NT, just. However this depends largely on partner's proclivities.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#5 User is offline   akhare 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,261
  • Joined: 2005-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-July-31, 23:26

What does "it" in "Even thinking about it..." option mean?

Does it mean that it's an automatic balance and that it's so obvious that you have to crazy to consider passing? Or does it mean that it's crazy to considering balancing with the hand?
foobar on BBO
0

#6 User is offline   CSGibson 

  • Tubthumper
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,835
  • Joined: 2007-July-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, OR, USA
  • Interests:Bridge, pool, financial crime. New experiences, new people.

Posted 2012-August-01, 01:57

depends on the partner. With some, I wouldn't consider it, with others who might pass a pretty big hand with inappropriate shape I would...probably still pass. Either partner has diamond shortness and couldn't act, or they are not in their best trump fit, and I should leave it alone.
Chris Gibson
0

#7 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,512
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2012-August-01, 06:11

I'm in with 1NT. The requirement to have 12-14 is too much. Although the enemy will not get rich playing in 1D, neither will I.
0

#8 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-August-01, 06:45

I would balance 1N.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

#9 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,703
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-August-01, 07:12

It's a point of shy of even thinking about it (whether briefly or insanely). B-)
(-: Zel :-)
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2012-August-01, 08:58

Was this a case where partner tanked over 1?

I'd pass, even though its dangerous at these colors. Per Harry Callahan, "a good man has to know his limitations".

We have a bad 10 count, a poor side suit and length in LHO's suit. Its unlikely we have much of a fit, and whatever plus we have we will make on power. Our doubleton spade is also a warning sign.

You'll hear the standard argument from players about "if we take 8 tricks, we are better off playing the hand than defending". While that is true, it will not do you much good if you are contracting for nine, or if the opponents can find a better strain.

If you balance, you know one of two things are about to happen:

1) Your opponents are going to find their spade fit. Or, LHO is rebidding 1N which will play better than 1. Or perhaps RHO suddenly joins the party and bids his long spade or club suit

2) Partner will raise to 3N. Can you blame him looking at a good 13 or 14?

edit: strange choice of poll answers
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#11 User is offline   lalldonn 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,066
  • Joined: 2012-March-06

Posted 2012-August-01, 09:06

My range over a minor is 11-14 so I would pass. I definitely think people bid 1NT too light, but that might be related to the fact that I think they don't double enough in direct seat on balanced hands.
"What's the big rebid problem? After 1♦ - 1♠, I can rebid 1NT, 2♠, or 2♦."
- billw55
0

#12 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-August-01, 09:08

I'm bidding 1nt in my regular partnership but passing otherwise.

Our overcall style in front of an unpassed partner requires more beef than most and partner would NEVER hang me beyond 2nt especially at mp's
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#13 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,488
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2012-August-01, 09:37

I'd pass

The risk / return ratio just doesn't seem right

1. Partner has points, but wasn't able to overcall 1
2. The opponents are declaring in a minor, which is rarely good at MP
3. We're red, they're white. The difference between -90 and -100 is a big one.

(10,000th post)
Alderaan delenda est
0

#14 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-August-01, 10:08

Congratulations!

You gotta draw the line somewhere and to me this is a point shy. By the way I don't think the poll options are necessarily in order.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#15 User is offline   Siegmund 

  • Alchemist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,764
  • Joined: 2004-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beside a little lake in northwestern Montana
  • Interests:Creator of the 'grbbridge' LaTeX typesetting package.

Posted 2012-August-01, 19:07

Personally I see lots of reasons to pass and not many reasons to think about bidding. NV I still wouldn't bid but I at least know people who would consider if they weren't vul.

Quote

Was this a case where partner tanked over 1♦?


No. What actually happened at the table was that the player holding these cards was in 2nd seat and passed on the first round, and a "discussion" arose as to whether it made any sense at all to play (p)-p-(1D)-p- (p)-1NT as natural (10-12?) even as a passed hand, rather than mini-unusual.

Essentially the answer depends on how many hands there where you would pass in 2nd seat but want to bid 1NT in balancing seat. (For a lot of people who "are a point shy of even thinking about it" the answer is clearly "almost none." For people who like bidding here, perhaps quite a few.)
0

#16 User is offline   Quantumcat 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 944
  • Joined: 2007-April-11
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Bathurst, Australia
  • Interests:Archery, classical guitar, piano, watercolour painting, programming, french

Posted 2012-August-01, 19:40

I pass it out. You have length in the opponent's suit. If pard has a good hand, he also has length in the opponent's suit. Defend.

Even if you are making some number of notrumps, if you bid then pard is going to get over-excited and you will end up in too high of a contract when you could have gotten an almost guaranteed positive from defending.

If you had a solid 1NT bid (12-14 or whatever your personal range is) that is fine, because then when pard bids 3NT or invites you have a decent shot at making it.
I Transfers
0

#17 User is offline   mikestar13 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 648
  • Joined: 2010-October-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:San Bernardino, CA USA

Posted 2012-August-01, 22:01

Not crazy but I wouldn't do it (assuming middle of the road direct overcalls). Exchange then spades and diamonds and it is an absolutely routine balancing double of 1. Either partner is weak or they are in they wrong suit. You do need a natural 1NT overcall in balancing seat, but it requires a it more than this I might even gamble on it if I had a third spade and the same high cards (better safety if partner has spades but no values and we need to run). I would think about it and probably do it if there were overriding state of the game considerations.
0

#18 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-August-01, 23:12

pass, not close to me
0

#19 User is offline   Rossoneri 

  • Wabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2007-January-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 2012-August-02, 02:39

I chose I might balance, but reading through the comments, the passers have won me over.
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD

Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
0

#20 User is offline   wyman 

  • Redoubling with gusto
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,712
  • Joined: 2009-October-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV
  • Interests:Math, Bridge, Beer. Often at the same time.

Posted 2012-August-02, 07:05

View PostJLOGIC, on 2012-August-01, 23:12, said:

pass, not close to me


Maybe I was thinking about this wrong, but:

* it seems like it's right to balance here almost anytime LHO has a weak NT, since I doubt that if we hold > half the deck that we're going to get rich playing for 50s

* if LHO holds a 18-19NT, he'll dbl. Do we have a place to run? RHO is unlikely to hold a 4cM (am I wrong about this? Especially white, it seems like people are responding on air pretty frequently). I have tolerance for clubs and hearts, and the only way pard would run out to spades is if he has 5+ (although admittedly if he has 5 spades this could be ugly since his hand is bad enough that he didn't overcall, the fact that he didn't overcall 1S also makes it less likely that he has 5 spades, so this could be kind of moot).

* if LHO holds 12-17 with diamonds, it also seems like we're likely to have a fit and around half the deck.

The -100 v -90 argument is compelling, but it's kind of a narrow range. I wish I had a good sense of the probabilities here. e.g., if I pass it out, what's my expected score? if I bid 1N, what are the probs that LHO hits it and it floats? that LHO hits it and pard bids? that it floats? that LHO passes and pard bids? And what we expect to score up in each case. But I definitely don't think I do. Hell, I don't even know what partner's expected shape is.

I'm really interested in comments.
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg

"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users