BBO Discussion Forums: Didn't get to slam... - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Didn't get to slam... Lost 16...

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-June-18, 16:30



Teams

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   ggwhiz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,952
  • Joined: 2008-June-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2012-June-18, 16:41

I would likely miss slam too but by agreement in my partnership you can't bid 5 without thinking you have at least a decent chance of making it.

That gives West a clear double and East a chance to bid on in inspired fashion. Kinda playing the 5 bidder to be crazy so we'll likely take our smallish plus right here.

My regular pard is a bit crazed when backed into a corner on these colours though and I'm 60-40 to have a 6 bid coming back to me.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
0

#3 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2012-June-18, 17:01

It was nice of North to bid again. Perhaps, on a good day, East would have decided to teach him a lesson and bid 6 out of pique.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#4 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2012-June-18, 17:07

Sorry, West did double.

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the 3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#5 User is offline   SteveMoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,168
  • Joined: 2012-May-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cincinnati Unit 124
  • Interests:Family, Travel, Bridge Tournaments and Writing. Youth Bridge

Posted 2012-June-18, 22:58

This is a bit of a magical fit, but there are some clues. East's 5 should be made on a 6-loser if we are to have solid chances to make (24-6-7=11). So West should know partner has 6 losers. How does West value the hand? On the surface there are 7 losers but the excess of Aces over Queens suggests upvaluing to 6 losers. How confident are you that 6+6=12?
Be the partner you want to play with.
Trust demands integrity, balance and collaboration.
District 11
Unit 124
Steve Moese
1

#6 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2012-June-20, 04:53

View PostSteveMoe, on 2012-June-18, 22:58, said:

How confident are you that 6+6=12?


Quite.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#7 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2012-June-21, 00:03

As East player i would definetely blast slam and would be defending 6 doubled most of the time. The times when they dont save i would either make it or have at least a reasonable out for it.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#8 User is offline   mikl_plkcc 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 321
  • Joined: 2008-November-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:sailing, bridge

Posted 2012-June-22, 08:55

No way, the preempt worked.

West was sure that 5 goes down but he has no method to find that whether 6 makes. By the way, the first double was bad, but it does not affect the further preempt.

East's hand suggests that 4 makes, therefore, he may just bid 5 as a sacrifice. 4 is either weak or strong, and is to play.

P.S. I missed the vulnerability, 5 is to make.
1

#9 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2012-June-22, 10:56

take advantage of the vulnerability-------------we do not sacrifice at these
colors it is just too darned difficult to be that accurate in the bidding at
game level. the 5h bid is to make.

E bid 5h saying he felt 5h was a reasonable contract opposite
a normal 2s x. E was willing to bid 5h despite missing the heart AQ
the spade A and the dia A. It is almost impossible to construct a 5h
bid from p where 6h does not have play opposite our collection. It is also
significant that E passed 5s which means they are not worried about 2
quick spade losers. E might also have x 5s if they bid 5h with a hand like
x Kxxxxxxxx xx x to warn p the 5h bid is more on distribution than power.

If we trust E bidding we must bid 6h.

Blasting to slam (with say 5n pick a slam) has some appeal but west
can be significantly stronger and we might still be missing the controls
needed for slam say A QJxx KQJx KQxx
1

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users