BBO Discussion Forums: What is the meaning of this double? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What is the meaning of this double? Delayed double

#1 User is offline   twcho 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 327
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hong Kong

Posted 2012-May-01, 01:38

Your LHO opens 3. Your partner passes and RHO raised to 4 and followed by two passes. Your partner reopens with a double. What is the meaning of this double? Does vulnerability affect the meaning?
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2012-May-01, 02:23

Some people play it as an initial penalty pass (well, could just be a balanced hand not quite good enough for an initial 3NT), but nowadays I think it's most common for this x to be takeout. Maybe something like - Axxx Axxxx xxxx or what not. Not quite enough for a first round double but catering to a double game swing or a nice penalty if partner has spade values. It might be playable to make it "takeout OR penalty, loot at your hand partner", but I don't think so - their fit can be anywhere between 8 and 12 cards, so partner can't tell what we have just by looking at his hand.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   bluecalm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,555
  • Joined: 2007-January-22

Posted 2012-May-01, 02:26

I had long discussion about this with one internet pd and we agreed that it's penalty if they are bidding spades and t/o if they are bidding hearts. At 3 level, say:
1/2S - p - 3S - p
p - d

We agreed to play it as t/o.
I am not convinced either way. My first instinct was "always penalty" but I have my doubts now and I am quite happy with our agreement as it surely has to be very rare scenario that we are happy to play on 5 level but weren't happy to double 3 level preempt. (or 2 level, or 1 level opening).
0

#4 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,703
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-May-02, 01:23

View Postbluecalm, on 2012-May-01, 02:26, said:

I had long discussion about this with one internet pd and we agreed that it's penalty if they are bidding spades and t/o if they are bidding hearts.

Takeout doubles up to 4 is often a good stand-by. You can use 4NT for general takeout over 4 if you are willing to give up on it being 2 places.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#5 User is offline   EricK 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,303
  • Joined: 2003-February-14
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-May-02, 01:56

View PostZelandakh, on 2012-May-02, 01:23, said:

Takeout doubles up to 4 is often a good stand-by. You can use 4NT for general takeout over 4 if you are willing to give up on it being 2 places.

You also give up on partner being able to pass for penalties - and that might be way too high a price.
0

#6 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,703
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2012-May-02, 02:02

View PostEricK, on 2012-May-02, 01:56, said:

You also give up on partner being able to pass for penalties - and that might be way too high a price.

Partner had a chance to act over 4. If you were playing this as stated they would probably have doubled for values then instead of passing. If you only play it in the passout seat then yes, you lose that possibility. If you have different defences for different seats you are probably well beyond using a simple stand-by rule though.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#7 User is offline   Statto 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 636
  • Joined: 2011-December-01
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Location:UK
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, but not in conflation.
    Statistics, but not massaged by the media.

Posted 2012-May-02, 18:41

View Posttwcho, on 2012-May-01, 01:38, said:

Your LHO opens 3. Your partner passes and RHO raised to 4 and followed by two passes. Your partner reopens with a double. What is the meaning of this double? Does vulnerability affect the meaning?

Penalty. No.

Partner presumably has a decent hand that was unsuitable for direct action over 3.
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem – Albert Einstein
0

#8 User is offline   tolvyrj 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 175
  • Joined: 2003-October-20

Posted 2012-May-02, 19:56

Just out of curiosity, what kind of a hand is unsuitable to take any action over 3, but is suitable to take action over 4 ?
I play it as a penalty dbl, if we got robbed blind by 4 bid so be it. If prd couldnt act T/O over 3 he shld not try it over 4.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users