I have found that many defences to opps 1n/t give a lot of information away to the declarer
of the 1n/t,and his pard has machinery to overcome the problem...
Whether ones opp is ply a weak or strong n/t ones anti system should be the same...
Vulnerability comes into the equation as well....
Suggestion---"Pirate def to opps 1n/t" its all about what position one is in.
we have 2nd pos'n and 4th pos'n.this depends who opens the 1n/t,you are in either pos'n.
So in second position we have transfers {Major's} Stayman asks pard do you have a 4 card major?
if no bid 2d...but you can agree to bid a 3 card major.also 2n/t is asking pard for Minors.
now 4th position...we have Natural-Stayman-2n/t minor orientated.
whatever position one is in we are competing not neccesary slamming or game orientated...
think on this sequence opp 1n/t you 2d=Bid hts pard,this besets a problem for the other opp?
if they pass message understood a calm bid of 2hts ensues.but if opp has a problem,
:)
and if it went 1n/t 2n/t{Minors)?????
I have used and compiled this defence with 80% success--Im prepared to admit the odd time it
backfires with no damage incurred