Page 1 of 1
JEC match a tough decision from wank
#1
Posted 2012-February-17, 05:41
Our side vulnerable
♠Qx
♥K9852
♦J9xx
♣10x
you deal and pass then....
pass-(pass)- 1 ♠ -( 2 ♦ )
pass-(pass)-double-(pass)
2 ♥ -( 3 ♦ )-double-(pass)
??
♠Qx
♥K9852
♦J9xx
♣10x
you deal and pass then....
pass-(pass)- 1 ♠ -( 2 ♦ )
pass-(pass)-double-(pass)
2 ♥ -( 3 ♦ )-double-(pass)
??
#2
Posted 2012-February-17, 05:54
4 ♥, the vul. and the nice queen looks great.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2012-February-17, 06:25
i wouldn't say this was an especially tough decision - i just made the wrong one , although possibly the right one looking at 52 cards ('looking at 52 cards'? an unfortunate phrase for a JEC match. at least after losing by 30 noone's going to accuse us of cheating though)
#4
Posted 2012-February-17, 07:53
4♥ seems clear. I have a lot more than I promised - a fifth heart, the ♠Q - and pard is inviting game. How can I turn down the invite?
#6
Posted 2012-February-17, 10:25
I would have doubled on the prior round.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#7
Posted 2012-February-17, 12:02
I would have bid 3!h after the first dble. Feels like I have a good hand opposite 54 spades, and I passed 2D so partner cannot get too crazy. 2H does not show much, fifth heart and Qx in partners suit, and 4 diamonds is pretty good here too.
Having passed twice is really good here, as over 2d I could have bid on 8-10 with 5 decent hearts since I already passed, and I could have doubled with a similar strength and 4 hearts. So 3 hearts over dble now surely shows 5-7 with 5 hearts or something.
Having passed twice is really good here, as over 2d I could have bid on 8-10 with 5 decent hearts since I already passed, and I could have doubled with a similar strength and 4 hearts. So 3 hearts over dble now surely shows 5-7 with 5 hearts or something.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#8
Posted 2012-February-17, 13:14
I'd have doubled 2♦, then I'd have jumped to 3♥, and now I bid game.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#9
Posted 2012-February-17, 13:51
my decision would be to jump over partner's take out double, maybe wank knows from my posting that I reopen with double with almost anything
#10
Posted 2012-February-17, 15:48
Yeah, seems like easy 4H. I didn't know it's wank playing I thought people have their bbo usernames here on the forum
#11
Posted 2012-February-20, 09:02
Well 4♥ made at the other table, partner had:
♠Axxxx
♥AQ10
♦Q
♣KQxx
Hearts are 4-1 but ♥J is stiff so ♥8 becomes very important. Simon could defeat the contract if he guessed to lead a trump.
♠Axxxx
♥AQ10
♦Q
♣KQxx
Hearts are 4-1 but ♥J is stiff so ♥8 becomes very important. Simon could defeat the contract if he guessed to lead a trump.
Page 1 of 1