Page 1 of 1
Hearts and doubleton queens Evaluation
#1
Posted 2012-January-25, 04:43
Red vs White, butler:
♠Q9
♥KJ9xx
♦K876
♣Q5
(Pass)-???
Do you open?
(Pa)-Pa-(1♣)-X
(1♦)-1♥-(2♣)-2♥
(Pa)-???
♠Q9
♥KJ9xx
♦K876
♣Q5
(Pass)-???
Do you open?
(Pa)-Pa-(1♣)-X
(1♦)-1♥-(2♣)-2♥
(Pa)-???
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2012-January-25, 04:59
Abstain - I'd bid 2♥ the first round.
ok if I can't abstain then I bid 3♥ now? who knows.
some people play that 2♥ promises significant extras, in that case this is an easy 4♥ bid but most people play that this is just competitive (i.e. all takeout doubles with 4 hearts will bid it), in which case we still don't have a GF hand.
ok if I can't abstain then I bid 3♥ now? who knows.
some people play that 2♥ promises significant extras, in that case this is an easy 4♥ bid but most people play that this is just competitive (i.e. all takeout doubles with 4 hearts will bid it), in which case we still don't have a GF hand.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#3
Posted 2012-January-25, 05:02
I can agree with a pass in second seat, but in the second round 1 ♥? Is this forcing?
Now I am very close to jump to 4 Heart, after all, I did not do my hand any justice with the bidding so far. But I try an invitational bid with a balanced hand- whatever this is in your system, in my it is 2 NT.
Now I am very close to jump to 4 Heart, after all, I did not do my hand any justice with the bidding so far. But I try an invitational bid with a balanced hand- whatever this is in your system, in my it is 2 NT.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#4
Posted 2012-January-25, 05:53
Not much to add to previous posters, I'm afraid. I agree with the initial pass - I don't really think this is an opening bid even in my Precision based system, though I could live with 1♥. But the 1♥ bid on the second round was absurd, I'm afraid, and makes it very difficult to give a sensible opinion now. Of course the 1♥ bid showed SOME values after responder bid 1♦, but you will never be able to convince partner you have anything like this hand. 2♥ couldn't possibly give partner the impression that you were stronger than you actually were given that the hand is a maximum for the initial pass.
#6
Posted 2012-January-25, 06:52
I would open 1♥ (assuming light openers), respond 2♥ to the double, and bid something unambiguously constructive now; probably 3♦ or 3♣.
(-: Zel :-)
#7
Posted 2012-January-25, 07:03
I had a part about 3♥ the round before in my original post but I'm not so happy with it, even if it's a super invitational hand (which it isn't for many people). This hand is not that good, no shape, 2x Qx..
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#8
Posted 2012-January-25, 08:01
whereagles, on 2012-January-25, 06:30, said:
Disagree with 2♥ the round before. The right bid is THREE HEARTS 
I also wondered whether 2♥ would have been enough. Without the 1♦ bid it certainly feels like you would want to do more, although perhaps it's not entirely clear what. With the 1♦ bid I'm happier that in raising the lower limit of a 1♥ bid you also implicitly raise the upper limit of a 2♥ bid slightly.
#9
Posted 2012-January-25, 08:36
2♥ or 3♥ the 2nd round depending on your hemisphere of origin.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Page 1 of 1

Help
