Fluffy, on 2011-November-23, 15:55, said:
win the queen of spades, then any player can have the ace.
This is standard protocol, however in this case you're risking getting yourself counted out (if LHO has something like AQx of diamonds), and your play is very obvious when you cross to dummy in clubs to duck into LHO (why would you do this when you have Qx of spades?).
Also, do you think LHO led from J9xx of spades? That would be a very weird lead, if he doesn't have the jack then again he will definitely know you have AQ of spades since with QJ you would play another spade yourself.
All of this risk for not even a guaranteed trick. I really hate the idea of gambling away the entire board by putting myself at their mercy, and not even telling a believable story, I'm just flat out hoping they do something terrible for not much reason, and even then I need a little help from the god of fortunes to give me 3-3 hearts. I'd rather take risks when I am in control, or at least when I'm selling a good story and believe I have a strong edge. Some boards are flat... taking 50 % is fine imo.
Phil asked "Its matchpoints. You reach an ordinary 3N on these cards: The Opening lead is the spade 3, low, T....
IMO, cash ♠A, ♣KAQJ, ♠Q, ♥K, ♠K76. A few lucky breaks and you make +3, for a fair score at matchpoints.
If you lead a ♦ at trick 3 and RHO ducks, then +4