mrdct, on 2011-November-10, 21:39, said:
As barmar has alluded to, in my part of world there is a radical difference between "accept" which says nothing extra about your hand and "super-accept" which explicitly promises primary support and in some cases other extra information as to strength and/or shape. Hence my disgreement with your suggestion that if you play "accepts" an alert is required.
In which case my post makes no sense whatever. I really do not understand how you can misunderstand it, I really don't.
Are you suggesting that I said that it is alertable if he completes the transfer and not if he doesn't. What is he going to do, pass the transfer?
So in Australia, to accept the transfer is to bid [say] 2
♥ over 2
♦, yes? What else do you do, reject it? Very strange!
Cyberyeti, on 2011-November-11, 04:41, said:
If it is then literally nobody has ever alerted one of these in my experience, so it is something that needs more publicity. We break on everything except minimum 4333s with 4 card support, does that require an alert ?
No. The completion would only be alertable if it denied four cards.