Page 1 of 1
business or no preference
#1
Posted 2010-November-04, 00:27
the auction is 1D (2C) P P dbl rdbl P P
Is partner sitting for 2C doubled or does he ask opener to make a preference?
I know that 1D dbl rdbl P shows no preference. Does the same logic apply?
Is partner sitting for 2C doubled or does he ask opener to make a preference?
I know that 1D dbl rdbl P shows no preference. Does the same logic apply?
#2
Posted 2010-November-04, 02:52
Generally it is the same logic. You bidded a t/o dbl and the opps REDBL, your partner has to choose which suit. Unfortunately you cant play the contract with XX, you cant have everything
#3
Posted 2010-November-04, 03:14
lesh, on 2010-November-04, 02:52, said:
Generally it is the same logic. You bidded a t/o dbl and the opps REDBL, your partner has to choose which suit. Unfortunately you cant play the contract with XX, you cant have everything
No, passing this one says you were passing 2♣X.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#4
Posted 2010-November-04, 03:42
1♦ - X -XX -pass is an exception the general rule is that passes of redoubles are to play.
#5
Posted 2010-November-04, 03:44
I like business when pass is over the bidder, and no preference when under the bidder.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#6
Posted 2010-November-04, 07:54
I was thinking business, too. It would be nice to find a central reference for sequences like that. I know Lawrence comments on a lot of stuff like that but it's scattered amongst many of his books.
#7
Posted 2010-November-04, 08:12
Business, otherwise everyone with a poor overcall can just RDbl and get off the hook
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#9
Posted 2010-November-04, 12:28
I play business when over the bidder and at the two-level or higher when under the bidder.
So this one is business.
So this one is business.
Wayne Burrows
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#10
Posted 2010-November-04, 14:04
I don't think there is a standard approach and you need an agreement, e.g. above one of a suit any pass of a redouble is for penalty.
#11
Posted 2010-November-04, 16:43
lesh, on 2010-November-04, 02:52, said:
Generally it is the same logic. You bidded a t/o dbl and the opps REDBL, your partner has to choose which suit. Unfortunately you cant play the contract with XX, you cant have everything
The logic should be different because these are very different auctions.
In (1♦) X (XX), opponents have announced majority of high cards, the chance for the advancer to have a hand that want to defend against 1♦-XX is so slim, unless the opponent psyched in XX. Now consider the auction of 1♦ (2♣) P (P); X (XX), it is quite normal for the responder to be trap-passing (actually opener's reopening double is sort of catering to that possibility), opponents haven't shown dominant combined values, and the overcaller is in perfect position to psych the XX, EXACTLY because many pairs never discussed the action over this XX.
Page 1 of 1