jdonn, on Dec 27 2008, 08:24 AM, said:
TimG, on Dec 26 2008, 10:15 AM, said:
So to summarize, I agree with you on your second point that the process should be more transparent. But as I said earlier, I couldn't care less about your first point, that system designers are left to guess what might or might not be approved. I don't believe they have some sort of right to convenience in that way.
Basically you are accepting that players that play some methods (more or less standard) have a right to have an advantage over those that play other methods.
This seems inherently unfair to me.