GIBBO robots often foolishly and illogically bid a minor when they should be bidding a major. Here, though, it seems they are doing the reverse:
After North fails to open the bidding in second seat, East opens 1S in third, and South doubles for takeout.
West bids 2S.
North looks at his hand: 95, 7642, QJ10976, K. He is red against white. Should he pass or should he bid?
Well, as far as I'm concerned, it's not even close. He should definitely, one hundred percent, bid. For once, GIBBO and I see eye to eye, because, to his credit, North does bid...but...
He bids three HEARTS. Yes, I understand that majors are "better" than minors and usually should take priority...but I think THIS hand is an exception. North is bidding at the three level, red against white, so he wants some safety and security. Diamonds provide both far more than hearts. In terms of quantity, he has SIX diamonds but only four hearts. In terms of quality, his SIX diamonds are very respectable, with almost perfect solidity from the queen down: QJ10976. Compare that quality to his FOUR hearts: the absolutely woeful 7642.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/j6f3x7bk
Benellis58 GIB bashing on repeat Groundhog Day
#1842
Posted 2026-June-12, 23:46
"Return a HEART at trick two? Are you crazy? Why would I ever want to return a HEART after my PARTNER led them?" asks a visibly agitated East.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p9dx3e2
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/2p9dx3e2
#1843
Posted Yesterday, 00:03
North's 3S bid: He tried his BEST to put us into a 3-3 (!) "fit" but fortunately he didn't succeed. Note, BTW, that he has one fewer spade than his own GIB definition promises and ALSO one fewer club than it promises. Moral: Don't ever trust a stinking GIBBO robot. Corollary: That means don't ever trust any GIBBO robot, because they all stink.
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/3jchx5ws
https://tinyurl.brid...se.com/3jchx5ws
#1844
Posted Today, 03:41
As South, I have quite a good hand, within the context of having "only" 12 HCP, but I "only" raised to 2S because:
A. I do have "only" 12 HCP, even though the hand is worth 15 "total" points.
B. North passed as dealer, so he has at most 11 HCP.
C. North, a cursed GIBBO robot, is - like all of his hopeless brethren - a lousy bidder in general but a notorious overbidder in particular.
After East bid 3C over my "mere" 2S and North and West both passed, I had an easy and obvious 3S call in passout seat. West passed, and now...
NORTH...bid...FOUR spades. Remember I said he was "a notorious overbidder"? See? Here's the proof that I didn't lie.
Note that he ALSO committed a typical CARDINAL sin of the execrable GIBBO robots: His partner competes/balances, and then the robot HANGS his partner for doing so. More often than not, he turns a plus into a minus, or he turns a potentially profitable sacrificial minus into a LOSING minus by making it a bigger and potentially doubled minus.
Here, it actually worked out well (more on that later), but that does NOT justify North's typically stupid and illogical 4S bid. Consider:
A. He MIGHT have competed over West's 3C, but he didn't. He didn't even think he was strong enough to merely compete to the THREE level, but now...NOW...his hand has MAGICALLY become strong enough to RAISE partner South's merely competitive call of three spades to four!
B. And it's not as if SOUTH has suddenly shown greater values, because (comically) the GIB definitions for BOTH (!) 2S AND 3S are IDENTICAL: "5+ hearts; 4+ spades; 11+ HCP; 12-16 total points".
So, there is absolutely NO justification, reason, or logic for North to be so inconsistent in his bidding, or to put it in more straightforward terms, North is an I.D.I.O.T.
I made 10 tricks for plus 420 and a score of 96.88 % on the board, tied with one other human who had the same result. The board was played in spades 12 times, and 10 of those times the human took fewer than 10 tricks.
At my table, regardless of layout or result, the EW "defenders" showed their typical "ability". East made one of his beloved (and often stupid and costly) leads: His stiff trump (spades). West won and shifted to a club. When East won his heart king at trick three, he shifted to a diamond. As so often happens, it looks like the "defenders" were at cross-purposes throughout and had no coherent strategy.
https://www.bridgeba...HT%7Cmc%7C10%7C
A. I do have "only" 12 HCP, even though the hand is worth 15 "total" points.
B. North passed as dealer, so he has at most 11 HCP.
C. North, a cursed GIBBO robot, is - like all of his hopeless brethren - a lousy bidder in general but a notorious overbidder in particular.
After East bid 3C over my "mere" 2S and North and West both passed, I had an easy and obvious 3S call in passout seat. West passed, and now...
NORTH...bid...FOUR spades. Remember I said he was "a notorious overbidder"? See? Here's the proof that I didn't lie.
Note that he ALSO committed a typical CARDINAL sin of the execrable GIBBO robots: His partner competes/balances, and then the robot HANGS his partner for doing so. More often than not, he turns a plus into a minus, or he turns a potentially profitable sacrificial minus into a LOSING minus by making it a bigger and potentially doubled minus.
Here, it actually worked out well (more on that later), but that does NOT justify North's typically stupid and illogical 4S bid. Consider:
A. He MIGHT have competed over West's 3C, but he didn't. He didn't even think he was strong enough to merely compete to the THREE level, but now...NOW...his hand has MAGICALLY become strong enough to RAISE partner South's merely competitive call of three spades to four!
B. And it's not as if SOUTH has suddenly shown greater values, because (comically) the GIB definitions for BOTH (!) 2S AND 3S are IDENTICAL: "5+ hearts; 4+ spades; 11+ HCP; 12-16 total points".
So, there is absolutely NO justification, reason, or logic for North to be so inconsistent in his bidding, or to put it in more straightforward terms, North is an I.D.I.O.T.
I made 10 tricks for plus 420 and a score of 96.88 % on the board, tied with one other human who had the same result. The board was played in spades 12 times, and 10 of those times the human took fewer than 10 tricks.
At my table, regardless of layout or result, the EW "defenders" showed their typical "ability". East made one of his beloved (and often stupid and costly) leads: His stiff trump (spades). West won and shifted to a club. When East won his heart king at trick three, he shifted to a diamond. As so often happens, it looks like the "defenders" were at cross-purposes throughout and had no coherent strategy.
https://www.bridgeba...HT%7Cmc%7C10%7C
#1845
Posted Today, 04:27
82.14 % for going down "only" one in 3NT. Given the bad splits in BOTH red suits, it looked like my only chance to go down "only" one was to play for a suicide squeeze against East. Thus, at trick seven, I exited with my spade 10. West won and safely cashed two more spades in tricks eight and nine. Then at trick ten he cashed his heart 10.
At this point (the conclusion of trick ten), NS had taken 6 tricks, EW 4. These were the three cards remaining in each of the four hands:
West, the "defender" currently on lead, had the high 8 of hearts and the J8 of clubs.
North, the dummy, had the 6 of hearts and the Q3 of clubs.
East, the other "defender", had the high queen of diamonds and the K10 of clubs.
South, the declarer (yours truly), had the 7 of diamonds and the A4 of clubs.
At trick eleven, West now...made the error of cashing his 8 of hearts, which created the suicide squeeze that I had envisioned at trick seven...because...North followed suit with the heart 6, but East had NO WINNING PLAY. If he pitched his high queen of diamonds, I would pitch my 4 of clubs and take the last two tricks with my club ace and my now-established diamond 7. And if East instead pitched a club from his K10 dub, I would pitch my diamond 7 and take the last two tricks with my club ace (at trick 12) and dummy's club QUEEN at trick 13, since East's now-STIFF king would have been played at trick 12.
So, a perfect suicide squeeze as I had envisioned at trick seven...BUT...West could and should have prevented it! At trick 11, rather than foolishly cashing his high 8 of hearts, he should have led a club. Whatever I did, the defenders would establish a club trick. If I played low from dummy, East's 10 (OR West's jack, if he had led that card from his J8) would force my ace, and I would be left with a losing club and a losing diamond. And if I played dummy's club QUEEN at trick 11, East would have covered with his king, forcing my ace, and again leaving me with a losing club and a losing diamond.
By defending correctly and NOT cashing his high heart 8 at trick 11, West would NOT have "assisted" me in the suicide squeeze. He would have NOT scored his HEART trick, but he would have been MORE than compensated by his partnership scoring TWO of the last three tricks rather than JUST one.
This was a defensive error perhaps more forgivable than most, since it was a more complex issue, but the fact nonetheless remains that when the GIBBO robot sitting West was presented with a test of his defensive ability, he FAILED it...as expected for these clueless jabronis.
https://www.bridgeba...CC8%7Cmc%7C8%7C
At this point (the conclusion of trick ten), NS had taken 6 tricks, EW 4. These were the three cards remaining in each of the four hands:
West, the "defender" currently on lead, had the high 8 of hearts and the J8 of clubs.
North, the dummy, had the 6 of hearts and the Q3 of clubs.
East, the other "defender", had the high queen of diamonds and the K10 of clubs.
South, the declarer (yours truly), had the 7 of diamonds and the A4 of clubs.
At trick eleven, West now...made the error of cashing his 8 of hearts, which created the suicide squeeze that I had envisioned at trick seven...because...North followed suit with the heart 6, but East had NO WINNING PLAY. If he pitched his high queen of diamonds, I would pitch my 4 of clubs and take the last two tricks with my club ace and my now-established diamond 7. And if East instead pitched a club from his K10 dub, I would pitch my diamond 7 and take the last two tricks with my club ace (at trick 12) and dummy's club QUEEN at trick 13, since East's now-STIFF king would have been played at trick 12.
So, a perfect suicide squeeze as I had envisioned at trick seven...BUT...West could and should have prevented it! At trick 11, rather than foolishly cashing his high 8 of hearts, he should have led a club. Whatever I did, the defenders would establish a club trick. If I played low from dummy, East's 10 (OR West's jack, if he had led that card from his J8) would force my ace, and I would be left with a losing club and a losing diamond. And if I played dummy's club QUEEN at trick 11, East would have covered with his king, forcing my ace, and again leaving me with a losing club and a losing diamond.
By defending correctly and NOT cashing his high heart 8 at trick 11, West would NOT have "assisted" me in the suicide squeeze. He would have NOT scored his HEART trick, but he would have been MORE than compensated by his partnership scoring TWO of the last three tricks rather than JUST one.
This was a defensive error perhaps more forgivable than most, since it was a more complex issue, but the fact nonetheless remains that when the GIBBO robot sitting West was presented with a test of his defensive ability, he FAILED it...as expected for these clueless jabronis.
https://www.bridgeba...CC8%7Cmc%7C8%7C
#1846
Posted Today, 04:38
96.15 % for "only" going down one in 4S (shared top with someone who went down one in TWO spades), so I'm certainly not complaining, but I'm not impressed by North's bidding, despite our good result. My OWN bidding is obviously EXTREMELY "conservative" for the USUAL reasons, and this is quite obviously a true FREAK of a hand, but ignoring everything up to and including South's 3NT call, it certainly seems that four CLUBS by North would be a more accurate description of his hand (given that he had SEVEN clubs and "only" six spades) than four SPADES.
https://www.bridgeba...CHK%7Cmc%7C9%7C
https://www.bridgeba...CHK%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#1847
Posted Today, 04:43
Thanks for the gift of your VERY helpful, and very questionable, lead, Mr. West: a lead which offered me a score of 100 % on a platter without even breathing hard, while you got to add another complete zero to your TRULY impressive MASSIVE collection. So: Maybe we're BOTH happy for different reasons.
https://www.bridgeba...DT%7Cpc%7CDQ%7C
https://www.bridgeba...DT%7Cpc%7CDQ%7C
#1848
Posted Today, 04:54
Another 100 for NS, but more amusingly, YET another complete zero for the two GIBBO imbeciles sitting EW...and a VERY well-deserved zero at that! Lots of silly "defensive" plays as usual, but the absolute STAR of stupidity is the way these braindead robots played the CLUB suit. That butchery belongs in the Stupidity Hall of Fame. Why were these hopeless GIBBO robots not destroyed long ago and replaced with COMPETENT robots?
https://www.bridgeba...CC4%7Cmc%7C9%7C
https://www.bridgeba...CC4%7Cmc%7C9%7C
#1849
Posted Today, 05:34
Since the other three players at the table are GIBBO robots, I do some typical operating in the bidding.
West makes a normal lead that happens to be an unfortunate one for his side, although East MIGHT have aided the EW defensive prospects by inserting the Curse of Scotland at trick one. He chose, however, to win his ace, and probably can't be criticized for that.
At trick two, East shifted to a spade, but TYPICALLY for these woefully inept all-time losers, he couldn't even manage to play the CORRECT spade. Although the GIBBO robots play FOURTH-best, the addlepated piece of trash played his FIFTH-best ( the 3 rather than the correct 6). This, I guess, is in keeping with the fact that these abysmal REJECTS seem to treat all spot cards as equals. It's about time that these REJECTS abandoned the game once and for all and gave up their "jobs" to COMPETENT robots!
West won his spade ace and...tried a THIRD suit, clubs. That's THREE different suits in THREE tricks...suggesting that they have NO strategy and NO idea what they're doing.
South...CLAIMED. EW had gone to bed with their spade king. No, the robots did NOT get a good score on the board. (Do they EVER? Well, yes, sometimes - but CERTAINLY not often!)
https://www.bridgeba...C3%7Cmc%7C11%7C
West makes a normal lead that happens to be an unfortunate one for his side, although East MIGHT have aided the EW defensive prospects by inserting the Curse of Scotland at trick one. He chose, however, to win his ace, and probably can't be criticized for that.
At trick two, East shifted to a spade, but TYPICALLY for these woefully inept all-time losers, he couldn't even manage to play the CORRECT spade. Although the GIBBO robots play FOURTH-best, the addlepated piece of trash played his FIFTH-best ( the 3 rather than the correct 6). This, I guess, is in keeping with the fact that these abysmal REJECTS seem to treat all spot cards as equals. It's about time that these REJECTS abandoned the game once and for all and gave up their "jobs" to COMPETENT robots!
West won his spade ace and...tried a THIRD suit, clubs. That's THREE different suits in THREE tricks...suggesting that they have NO strategy and NO idea what they're doing.
South...CLAIMED. EW had gone to bed with their spade king. No, the robots did NOT get a good score on the board. (Do they EVER? Well, yes, sometimes - but CERTAINLY not often!)
https://www.bridgeba...C3%7Cmc%7C11%7C
#1850
Posted Today, 05:41
West exposes his MASSIVE ignorance with his TRULY imbecilic REVERSE (!!!) of 2S. Please toss each and every GIBBO robot into a bottomless pit and then cover it with tar (and maybe a few feathers). These useless robots are a huge pimple on the face of bridge.
https://www.bridgeba...S5%7Cpc%7CH2%7C
https://www.bridgeba...S5%7Cpc%7CH2%7C

Help
