Page 1 of 1
Another Grinch
#1
Posted Yesterday, 23:19
Let's start with an easy question
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
#3
Posted Today, 01:13
X is ill advised, especially with a descriptive 2H available (6-cd suit, 12-14). Pattern and honor quality make us very max for the call but 3H is a bit too much I think.
#4
Posted Today, 02:33
1♥; for me 2♥ is more like 8-11 (a hand where Im trying to stop opener from bidding again and/or stop partner from inviting) rather than showing a hand that would open 1♥ and rebid 2.5♥. Double would not occur to me although I guess it would be right in the old-fashioned French balancing style some of our teammates use.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#6
Posted Today, 03:26
1♥ for me since 2♥ is either 5♥4♠ or weak ♥ depending on partner
Addition:
The hand has playing strength for 3♥ as an intermediate jump, but typically I need a stronger or longer suit for that and no side suit
Addition:
The hand has playing strength for 3♥ as an intermediate jump, but typically I need a stronger or longer suit for that and no side suit
#8
Posted Today, 06:38
Our jump overcalls in the balancing seat showed about 13-16 HCP and a decent 6-card suit. So, another vote for 2♥.
Maybe a little off topic but an interesting question for me is where the dividing line is between a suit overcall and double-then-bid to show a stronger hand in the balancing seat. (More applicable with a 5-card suit I think.)
Maybe a little off topic but an interesting question for me is where the dividing line is between a suit overcall and double-then-bid to show a stronger hand in the balancing seat. (More applicable with a 5-card suit I think.)
#10
Posted Today, 07:18
I'm with the 1♥ bidders, what do you expect partner to have for his X?
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
#12
Posted Today, 07:27
jillybean, on 2024-December-23, 07:18, said:
I'm with the 1♥ bidders, what do you expect partner to have for his X?
Perhaps in terms of strength the pertinent question is what do you expect North to have for their rebid given South has shown a hand too weak to bid?
If you know this then partner's range of strength becomes deterministic, but at a minimum I would expect ~8+hcp and 8.5 modified losers or less given South's Pass and tolerance for any non-♦ rebid with at least 44 in the black suits
#13
Posted Today, 07:59
It should not be a penalty X. Rather some kind of responsive, with decent values (10+ to 15 that could not act), given 1H balance can be weakish. Either a ratty 5-cd S suit that did not want to overcall (in that case the hand will be minimal) or most often 4-cd only, and a tolerance but no fit for H. That leaves 4234, 4225, 5224 etc in the picture but sometimes 5233 with 3 low D. Or 5125-5134-4135 a bad day.
In all cases we will play game but sometimes slam will be a mundane hand like Axxx AQ xxx, Qxxx, or make the HA the DA. What do you bid with that over 1D? That leaves opener with a good 6 or 7-cd D suit by AKQ or KQJ + HA, and the spade QJ as side goodies to act. Not the most likely but one never knows.
I guess 3D will help assess prospects, including C contracts, if partner does not bid 3H over that.
In all cases we will play game but sometimes slam will be a mundane hand like Axxx AQ xxx, Qxxx, or make the HA the DA. What do you bid with that over 1D? That leaves opener with a good 6 or 7-cd D suit by AKQ or KQJ + HA, and the spade QJ as side goodies to act. Not the most likely but one never knows.
I guess 3D will help assess prospects, including C contracts, if partner does not bid 3H over that.
Page 1 of 1