BBO Discussion Forums: LOL - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

LOL Mea culpa

#1 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2020-December-03, 09:01


3N would have been simpler but South is declarer in 5 on the lead of A 2 Q 4. Both defenders follow to KA.
I'm ashamed to admit that this deal is based on another contract that I butchered, recently. It illustrates a useful simple common basic technique, so I'm rubbing my nose in it by posting it here.

2

#2 User is offline   Douglas43 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 675
  • Joined: 2020-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Isle of Man
  • Interests:Walking, boring my wife with bridge stories

Posted 2020-December-03, 09:23

Thanks for posting Nigel. It's a classic hand. Looks like you should play a diamond and, instead of ruffing, ditch a heart from dummy? Then you can ruff a heart in dummy.

This loser on loser play doesn't cost anything when diamonds are 3-3, because you would not otherwise be able to avoid a heart loser. But it's not an easy play to spot at the table...
1

#3 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,204
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2020-December-03, 09:50

View PostDouglas43, on 2020-December-03, 09:23, said:

Thanks for posting Nigel. It's a classic hand. Looks like you should play a diamond and, instead of ruffing, ditch a heart from dummy? Then you can ruff a heart in dummy.

This loser on loser play doesn't cost anything when diamonds are 3-3, because you would not otherwise be able to avoid a heart loser. But it's not an easy play to spot at the table...


It's not 100% foolproof but looks the best shot.

It depends if you think W will overcall with AK, 1098765, ????, x or double with AKx, KQ, ????, xxxx with W holding a 3721 with QJx, J 7th and maybe a diamond quack and not overcalling.
0

#4 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2020-December-03, 16:50


3N would have been simpler but South is declarer in 5 on the lead of A 2 Q 4. Both defenders follow to KA.
I'm ashamed to admit that this deal is based on another contract that I butchered, recently. It illustrates a useful simple common basic technique, so I'm rubbing my nose in it by posting it here.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I ruffed the 3rd diamond and could not recover :(
Douglas43 and CyberYeti found the successful loser-on-loser play that I missed:
- Discard a on the 3rd :) and
- Discard another heart if West continues with a 4th diamond :)
- Now you can ruff a in dummy.



1

#5 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,204
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2020-December-03, 17:58

It would be unfortunate if you got one of the layouts where it failed (either because E pitches 2 hearts on the diamonds then overruffs you, or pitches 2 spades and uppercuts with a stiff trump), but it seems to work a very large percentage of the time.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users