BBO Discussion Forums: New ACBL Convention Charts! - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

New ACBL Convention Charts!

#1 User is offline   perko90 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 203
  • Joined: 2012-June-06
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Colorado

Posted 2018-March-29, 08:57

At Philly, the new Convention chart proposal passed!
http://www.acbl.org/...vention-charts/

What do you think are going to be the most popular changes to systems/bidding based on these changes?

Here's my list:
1) Multi 2
2) Transfer Walsh *** my personal favorite change and biggest reason to celebrate!
3) Kaplan Inversion (after 1, the 1 and 1NT responses are flipped)

Then to a lesser extent ...
4) Multi-way forcing 1 systems in general (Polish, Carrot, Tangerine, etc.) combined with some sort of transfer responses (T-Walsh, for ex.)
5) Canape'- responder now can bid next step as an artificial negative

And then just speculation ...
6) Forcing 1 systems? A 1 response doesn't have to be natural any more.
7) Forcing 1NT that promise invite or better values?

What else? I don't know a lot of what's out there because I've always tried to restrict my theoretical wanderings to GCC legal topics.
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,487
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2018-March-29, 10:26

There is (pretty much) no change to the rules wrt multi 2D
Still banned in anything less that 7 boards.

As Adam pointed on on bridgewinners, you could play a strong multi 2D opening (showing 10+ HCPs)
Not sure how popular that would prove to be...
Alderaan delenda est
0

#3 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2018-March-29, 15:55

On what lowest level card will T-Walsh be allowed?
0

#4 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,487
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2018-March-29, 18:18

View Postneilkaz, on 2018-March-29, 15:55, said:

On what lowest level card will T-Walsh be allowed?


Open (I believe)

I didn't see any language permitting this on the two lower level charts and it doesn't appear to be banned in the Open Chart
Alderaan delenda est
0

#5 User is offline   steve2005 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,162
  • Joined: 2010-April-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hamilton, Canada
  • Interests:Bridge duh!

Posted 2018-March-30, 03:53

View Postperko90, on 2018-March-29, 08:57, said:

And then just speculation ...
6) Forcing 1 systems? A 1 response doesn't have to be natural any more.

This was always allowed assuming 1D promised 15 hcp.
Sarcasm is a state of mind
0

#6 User is offline   TomReynold 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 24
  • Joined: 2015-September-20

Posted 2018-April-19, 23:35

View Poststeve2005, on 2018-March-30, 03:53, said:

This was always allowed assuming 1D promised 15 hcp.


True. I play 1D=15+ 1D-1H (6-9 or 14-15), 1D-1S (0-5) and 1D-1NT and above Symmetric Relay. The system is GCC under the old method and the only pre-alert is the canapé 1H and 1S opening which is not necessary to play.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users