BBO Discussion Forums: ATB - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ATB NAOP DIstrict Final

Poll: ATB (34 member(s) have cast votes)

Who should bid spades - North or South?

  1. South directly over 3H (7 votes [20.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 20.59%

  2. North directly over 4H (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. South after 4H is passed around to him (21 votes [61.76%])

    Percentage of vote: 61.76%

  4. Both North and South should have bid spades (3 votes [8.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.82%

  5. Neither should bid - no one is at fault (3 votes [8.82%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.82%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#41 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2014-October-24, 03:57

View PostArtK78, on 2014-October-23, 11:50, said:

Funny thing. Playing in a BBO ACBL IMP pair game the other night, I held Axxxx -- xx QT9xxx. After passing in first seat at all vul, the bidding proceeded (2) - P - (4) back to me. I trotted out 4. It went (P) - P - (5). My partner, holding

KQJT
AKJ82
JT74
---

found a double for 1400.

I won't trouble you by reproducing the EW hands, as it would make you sick.

Had I not bid 4, I would not be 100% comfortable with sitting for my partner's eventual double of 4. And perhaps he would pass out 4 out of fear of a pull to 5.

So, what is the moral of this story?


I dont understand why you wouldnt be comfortable sitting the double. Partner made a penalty double and I have an Ace when I could have nothing - will expect 500 at minimum
1

  • 3 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

4 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users