Help
♠A
♥J63
♦AQJ10973
♣64
all vul, IMPs
(2♠)-double-(3♠)-??
What do you bid in your partnership?
What do you bid with no agreements?
Page 1 of 1
a bit preempted
#1
- World International Master without a clue
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,404
- Joined: 2003-November-13
- Gender:Male
- Location:madrid
Posted 2013-March-07, 16:27
#2
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2013-March-07, 16:29
5♦ in all cases. Bid what I think I can make.
There is just too much information that I would like to convey to partner and no sensible way to convey it. So, at the risk of repeating myself, I will just bid what I think I can make. I don't see a rational way to convey first round control of the opponents' suit and long and strong diamonds.
There is just too much information that I would like to convey to partner and no sensible way to convey it. So, at the risk of repeating myself, I will just bid what I think I can make. I don't see a rational way to convey first round control of the opponents' suit and long and strong diamonds.
#3
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,660
- Joined: 2011-February-12
Posted 2013-March-07, 17:44
There is just too much potential here to sign off in 5d.
We are looking at 6 if p has as little as xxx KQTx Kx Axxx
and it is unlikely p started with x with that hand so we
can generally expect more. There indeed is no rational
way to show first round spade control and all this firepower
so we bid what we think we can make and bid
6d.
We are looking at 6 if p has as little as xxx KQTx Kx Axxx
and it is unlikely p started with x with that hand so we
can generally expect more. There indeed is no rational
way to show first round spade control and all this firepower
so we bid what we think we can make and bid
6d.
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,171
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted 2013-March-07, 18:02
6♦ for me, maybe pd has xx, AKQx, Kxx, Jxxx, bet they lead a spade or a trump 
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2013-March-07, 18:08
gszes, on 2013-March-07, 17:44, said:
There is just too much potential here to sign off in 5d.
We are looking at 6 if p has as little as xxx KQTx Kx Axxx
and it is unlikely p started with x with that hand so we
can generally expect more. There indeed is no rational
way to show first round spade control and all this firepower
so we bid what we think we can make and bid
6d.
We are looking at 6 if p has as little as xxx KQTx Kx Axxx
and it is unlikely p started with x with that hand so we
can generally expect more. There indeed is no rational
way to show first round spade control and all this firepower
so we bid what we think we can make and bid
6d.
If you are going to bid 6♦, why not bid 4♠ first?
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,240
- Joined: 2012-June-25
Posted 2013-March-07, 18:17
ArtK78, on 2013-March-07, 18:08, said:
If you are going to bid 6♦, why not bid 4♠ first?
Because it leaks information to the opening leader, and exploring seven is almost impossible (and this is as good a way to explore seven as any). Not that that I would bid Six - just saying.
This looks like a perfect hand for the snappily named "4NT = a good 5m response" convention.
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 4,082
- Joined: 2006-August-31
- Gender:Male
- Location:Santiago, Chile
- Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.
Posted 2013-March-07, 19:44
If you bid 4♠, wouldn't partner believe hearts to be trumps? If that is a possibility the 6♦, if not then why not 4♠?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win
My YouTube Channel
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,240
- Joined: 2012-June-25
Posted 2013-March-07, 19:46
Hanoi5, on 2013-March-07, 19:44, said:
If you bid 4♠, wouldn't partner believe hearts to be trumps?
Why would he think that?
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,952
- Joined: 2008-June-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2013-March-08, 09:11
Hanoi5, on 2013-March-07, 19:44, said:
If you bid 4♠, wouldn't partner believe hearts to be trumps? If that is a possibility the 6♦, if not then why not 4♠?
I think pard will just cuebid, probably 5♣ which opens you up to a lead directing double or without one, a heart lead from an astute defender.
I'm blasting 6♦
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
Page 1 of 1