Cue-bidding with Last Train
#1
Posted 2013-February-12, 02:00
4♥ would be Last Train, showing a club control.
If I bid 5♣ instead of 4♥, what does that show?
If I bid 4♥, partner bids 4♠, and now I bid 5♣, what does that show?
#2
Posted 2013-February-12, 04:15
If you bid 4H and then 5C over 4S you have shown a heart control. If you bid 5C directly you deny a heart control.
Seems natural.
- hrothgar
#3
Posted 2013-February-12, 04:22
gnasher, on 2013-February-12, 02:00, said:
4♥ would be Last Train, showing a club control.
For the record: any bid -other than 4♠- shows a club control. So last train shows a club control and:
- either a hand that isn't sure there are 12 tricks*
- or a hand that is sure of 12 tricks and has a heart control
gnasher, on 2013-February-12, 02:00, said:
1st round club control, no heart control, 12 tricks
gnasher, on 2013-February-12, 02:00, said:
1st round club control, 1st/2nd round heart control, 12 tricks
Rik
* For me slam bidding consists of two parts 1) establish that we have 12 tricks, 2) establish that they don't have 2 before that (controls). So when I write "12 tricks" I mean "the potential to take 12 tricks, not looking at the control situation (which might mean that they take 2 first)".
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#4
Posted 2013-February-12, 04:23
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#5
Posted 2013-February-12, 05:59
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#6
Posted 2013-February-12, 12:48
han, on 2013-February-12, 04:15, said:
If you bid 4H and then 5C over 4S you have shown a heart control. If you bid 5C directly you deny a heart control.
Seems natural.
Yeah this
#7
Posted 2013-February-13, 07:44
4♥ does not show nor deny a heart control.
Without a heart control, partner must bid 4 ♠. If I bid on, I obviously have a heart control.
With a heart control, partner will bid on- usually with RKCB, very seldom with further control bids.
So, if I bid 5 club directly, I show both controls in hearts and clubs and that I am not interessting in asking or answering RCKB.
So on balance, I win over the "usual" style if I just play 4 ♠ instead of 5 ♠ without a heart control.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#8
Posted 2013-February-13, 08:33
- hrothgar
#9
Posted 2013-February-13, 19:46
4NT = keycard (I have H+C controls)
4H-4S-4nt = Im lacking a H control so reply keycard if you have a H control or bid 5S if not (denying H control) or you can do the otherway around if you prefer.
There is 2 upside you can ask for keycards even if you dont have a H control (fairly frequent) rather than bidding 5C and praying. Plus 4H followed by 5C become a void somewhere not just a lack of H control.
The downside is that with 2+Q and a H control opener has to bid 5NT not 5S (it can be dangerous)
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#10
Posted 2013-February-14, 06:05
han, on 2013-February-13, 08:33, said:
I would assume he plays some kind of Serious/Frivolous beforehand and is assuming that we are in a serious auction at this stage.
#11
Posted 2013-February-14, 11:06
han, on 2013-February-13, 08:33, said:
Like you and anybody else, I usually have found it out before I cuebid at the 4. level...
Of course if there are tricky auctions - maybe even with opponents bidding- or a quite late agreement of the trump suit, this might be difficult, but Andy did not mentioned such a problem.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#12
Posted 2013-February-15, 09:12
#13
Posted 2013-February-15, 12:00
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#14
Posted 2013-February-15, 17:01
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2013-February-15, 12:00, said:
When I was a starting bridge player in University, I played a few times with a nice German math student who wasn't very experienced either. He suggested that we would play Jacoby 2NT. That was fine with me and I asked how we would follow up after that. He shrugged his shoulders and said: "Cuebidding, I guess...". (This meant first round controls first.) Then I asked what 3NT would mean in such a sequence. At first we couldn't come up with a meaning, but then I suggested: "How about if it shows a control in the trump suit?". That was a great idea and he followed up with: "But then we don't need Blackwood and 4NT shows a control in the trump suit too." We agreed immediately that this would not come up anyway.
However, on the 4th board of the evening, the auction went something like:
1♥-2NT
3♦-3♥ (cue-waiting)
3♠-3NT (cue-trump cue)
4♣-4♦ (cue - cue)
4♠-4NT (cue - trump cue)
7♥
We bid a grand on 25 HCP and a void in each hand. Somehow my partner made it (he shouldn't have). The rest of the score sheet only showed 4♥+2 and 4♥+1.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#15
Posted 2013-February-15, 18:50
TWO4BRIDGE, on 2013-February-15, 12:00, said:
There's a lot of luck in this game. Too many people think
they can control everything. My thoughts is: if partner is
interested in slam and I'm interested in slam just bid it.
Maybe it makes and maybe it doesn't. When it doesn't, if
we haven't given too much info, maybe opponents will
misdefend.