BBO Discussion Forums: Indecision time - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Indecision time SBU Winter Foursomes

#1 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,062
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2013-January-21, 16:47

Our opponents in the final of the SBU Winter Foursomes are our regular team mates on the annual trip to an NABC so it was a competitive match. One of them took over five minutes to make a call on this hand, but how difficult was it?

IMPS, NS Game



Four clubs is non-leaping Michaels, showing clubs and a major in a strong hand. Four clubs is non-forcing but rarely passed. Your call.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#2 User is offline   Lord Molyb 

  • Slightly less bad player
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 964
  • Joined: 2012-October-16
  • Gender:Female
  • Interests:Bridge

Posted 2013-January-21, 16:57

pass?
Become yourself.
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2013-January-21, 17:33

I'd pass. They never have what you want them to have, and he could have passed to show some interest.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,519
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-January-21, 17:53

And that's why it's better to discuss your minimum for 4 rather than adding another gadget...
In any case, I think it's normal to bid 4 with AQJxx xx x AKxxx or AJxxx xx x AKQxx, so I pass. There are also 65 hands with similar high cards where it's even more clear to bid.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
0

#5 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2013-January-21, 17:55

partner's premature bid of 6 indicates that he is not willing to try 7, he will normally not have diamond void unless he had really stretched for the 4 bid. Finding partner with a sub-minum hand with diamond void would be really bad even for the 6 level. But the more likelly minimum hand without void must make slam at worse on a finese against the non opener. Still i would just pass.
0

#6 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,658
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2013-January-21, 21:24

echo pass since p should be showing a min they had
xx and pass they could have used to show extra values.
0

#7 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-January-21, 23:48

I think it's a pretty easy pass.
0

#8 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,062
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2013-January-22, 02:15

Partner held:


A Pass did eventually emerge. Flat board.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#9 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2013-January-22, 09:13

So he thought, he needs to show his major- because you asked him.
And most here thought that 6 denies a good hand.

I have no idea who is right, but the majority seems to have a clear view..


Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#10 User is offline   PhilKing 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,240
  • Joined: 2012-June-25

Posted 2013-January-22, 09:41

I play 5NT to show a grand slam try, and that's what I would have done, since AQJxx xx x AKQxx and Ax QJxxx x AKQxx are in range (we play 4 as four or five losers so we need 4 cover cards to try).

7 will make with the major 4-1 a fair amount of the time on the cases where partner lacks the major suit jack and opener is, say, 1372. I get to an indifferent grand when pard has AQJxx x x AKxxxx.

6 just asks partner for his major and denies interest in seven. Obviously tanking for five minutes is ludicrous. Firstly, we should have done our thinking on the previous round of bidding. Secondly, it shouldn't take long to construct hands where seven has no play, particularly when the opposition made it easy for partner to show no grand slam potential by doubling 6 for a laugh.
0

#11 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2013-January-22, 21:38

It's a clear pass.

Ques.: From your hand, how certain can you be that 13 tricks are there if you bid on?

Ans.: You really can't very certain at all.

So it's right to take the pretty sure small slam positive rather than guess on the grand. If you bid the grand and it makes, you're gaining 12 IMPs. If you bid the grand and it goes down, you're losing 17 IMPs. The break even point is at about a 60% chance that the grand will make.

With this hand, there's just no way to know if the chance of making the grand is that good.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users