Quote
Fiscal Cliff And now?
#221
Posted 2012-December-29, 08:55
#222
Posted 2012-December-29, 09:02
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#223
Posted 2012-December-29, 09:08
blackshoe, on 2012-December-29, 09:02, said:
Becky continues to be astonished by what I learn from reading BBO threads.
#224
Posted 2012-December-31, 02:00
kenberg, on 2012-December-29, 09:08, said:
Ken we have 2 options:
1) doing nothing
2) doing what you want
If your option is better ok.
We cannot agree increase taxes..lower taxes
increase spending....decrease
you do the math
I understand you want others to do the math. You want others to lead.
ok ok this is unfair .......feel free to insert other...that is called politics
#225
Posted 2012-December-31, 06:02
mike777, on 2012-December-31, 02:00, said:
1) doing nothing
2) doing what you want
I have never before been given such stunning power. You are saying that doing what Y66 wants, or what Blalckshoe wants, or perhaps what you want, is not even on the table? It's my way or nothing? Does Obama know this? Should we not call Boehner et all Congreesional leader? Should we just call them electees? Some sort of neutral term indicating we really do not expect much from them? They got elected, now they can putter around and if any crisis comes up they should either do nothing or call Ken Berg for the solution?
Quote
increase spending....decrease
you do the math
What math?
Quote
ok ok this is unfair .......feel free to insert other...that is called politics
People run for the job of leading the country and then it is unfair to expect them to lead? Why is that? If really they, or you, want me to make all of the decisions they should have given me a call before setting up this stupid fiscal cliff. I'm pretty sure I had nothing good to say about the idea at the time they put it in place..The idea was that they would set something up that was so awful that even Congress would realize it could not be allowed to happen. I do not share this faith.
It's not like I have said nothing about the general principles. I am prepared to accept some adjustments in my medicare payments providing it is part of a workable plan where everyone accepts some responsibility for bringing the deficit under control. Medical expenses need to be brought down, but I want good medical care available. Since other places have good care at lesser cost, this does not seem like an unrealistic goal. But even if the costs are brought down, there will be costs. We are lucky enough to live at a time when medical care has made enormous advances, and these advances cost money. I expect to pay my share.
I really don't understand your post at all.
At a fundamental level, our elected representatives are an embarrassment to the country.
One of the lesser known quotes from the Pogo strip: "If I could only write I would write a nasty letter to the Mayor if he could only read".
#226
Posted 2013-January-02, 07:46
Quote
”In the end, it came down to two 70-year-old men, talking on the phone. They are not the most powerful men in Washington: Each, in his own way, is a second fiddle. Joseph R. Biden Jr. is vice president. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is the Senate minority leader, in charge only of the senators who are not in charge. But these two men — rivals, colleagues and wary friends for almost 28 years — were the ones who finally struck a deal to end the ‘fiscal cliff’ crisis. The New Year’s Eve agreement between Biden and McConnell provided a glimpse at the ways that personality quirks and one-to-one relationships can still change the course of Washington politics.” David A. Fahrenthold and Ed O’Keefe in The Washington Post.
#227
Posted 2013-January-02, 08:04
y66, on 2013-January-02, 07:46, said:
I ain't counting any chickens until the House has spoken...
Still plenty of ways they can screw things up.
#228
Posted 2013-January-02, 09:21
hrothgar, on 2013-January-02, 08:04, said:
Still plenty of ways they can screw things up.
And looks as if we have a deal!
#229
Posted 2013-January-02, 12:13
#230
Posted 2013-January-02, 12:20
I say we all should vote out every incumbent, and then we'll actually have a decent working national gov't!
"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."
"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."
-Alfred Sheinwold
#231
Posted 2013-January-02, 12:53
hrothgar, on 2013-January-02, 08:04, said:
Still plenty of ways they can screw things up.
Looks like the jockeying for poll position in '16 has already begun.
I guess one fist pump wasn't sufficient.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#232
Posted 2013-January-02, 14:44
#233
Posted 2013-January-03, 00:51
#234
Posted 2013-January-03, 21:16
chasetb, on 2013-January-02, 12:20, said:
I say we all should vote out every incumbent, and then we'll actually have a decent working national gov't!
It wouldn't matter - gerrymandering in the lower house ensures that all the seats are safe. You need to change your electoral system that isn't extracted from the darkest depths of Northen Ireland if you want things to change.
It's quite simple to fix the US electoral system, but the changes required (abolish gerrymandered districts, institution instant runoff, preferential or proportional representation in the upper and lower houses, then optionally add compulsory voting) are unappetizing to the entrenched political elites.
#235
Posted 2013-January-03, 21:27
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean