Critical MP decision - II
#2
Posted 2012-July-26, 12:17
#3
Posted 2012-July-26, 12:22
www.longbeachbridge.com
#4
Posted 2012-July-26, 12:40
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
#5
Posted 2012-July-26, 12:47
Junior - Always looking for new partners to improve my play with..I have my fair share of brilliancy and blunders.
"Did your mother really marry a Mr Head and name her son Richard?" - jillybean
#7
Posted 2012-July-26, 14:10
i do see a temptation to X though. i agree that partner probably has 4 spades (LHO didn't raise, and RHO would probably just repeat his spades with a 6 at MPs) which makes our diamond pips very hot defensive cards.
i'm inclined to say i would X it, but that may well be a case of paper tigering, after all it's a very small target you're aiming for, i.e. -1.
now what to lead? Lots of creative options available. I'll try the ace of hearts.
#8
Posted 2012-July-26, 17:06
Personally, I would pass, they might not have a fit which is a big consideration to me (this sequence is often a 5-2 fit), and our diamond honors are very defensive. AT9x of hearts and Axxx of diamonds I would bid since I have much less defense and more offense (given the likely bad heart split). Being vul is obviously bad, we could get doubled pretty easily (by either hand), and if we aren't we might go down 2 anyways.
#9
Posted 2012-July-26, 17:34
The defense lost its way a little. I led a club to the J and Q. Declarer drew three rounds of trump and I pitched a heart on the 3rd. She exited a heart, and I did not unblock on the 3rd round, so she pitched a diamond forcing me to play a diamond or a club, so we were +100.
Even if I pitch a diamond on the 3rd round of trump, declarer can establish a diamond trick by force, even if it isn't obvious early where the diamond pictures are.
+100 was a 25.5 on a 75 top.
If you bid 3♥, +140 is 53.5.
If you double 2♠, +200 is a 69.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2012-July-26, 22:00
Getting 35 % on a hand like this has never lost anyone an event, and IIRC this was a hand from the qualifiers anyways.
#11
Posted 2012-July-27, 02:46
JLOGIC, on 2012-July-26, 22:00, said:
Getting 35 % on a hand like this has never lost anyone an event, and IIRC this was a hand from the qualifiers anyways.
even if he has spade values they are poorly placed though. I mean can partner really be 3433 on this auction, yeah maybe, but you could rearrange his HCP around and 3H would still be the good call, the A109x and Axxx and xx spade are worth 3H in and of themselves in this auction IMO.
www.longbeachbridge.com
#12
Posted 2012-July-27, 14:34
#13
Posted 2012-July-27, 14:52
CSGibson, on 2012-July-27, 14:34, said:
You still could have guessed the diamonds
#14
Posted 2012-July-27, 14:55
#15
Posted 2012-July-27, 15:16
JLOGIC, on 2012-July-27, 14:52, said:
I could have, but didn't, alas.