9 diamonds
#2
Posted 2012-January-03, 11:35
ahydra
#3
Posted 2012-January-03, 12:25
2♣ then 4♦ will force partner to cuebid ♥A, that´s what I´d try
#4
Posted 2012-January-03, 12:41
#5
Posted 2012-January-03, 14:56
#6
Posted 2012-January-03, 15:12
-gwnn
#7
Posted 2012-January-03, 15:22
The only situation I wouldn't do that is playing against a much weaker team.
I'm not sure what the problem is with partner/teammates. The explanation is 'I couldn't think of a way to find out if we had a club loser or not, so I decided to take what I thought was the best approach to bidding the hand'.
#8
Posted 2012-January-03, 16:46
whereagles, on 2012-January-03, 14:56, said:
Agree 6♦ seems to be the a priori best punt (needs ♣Q, ♥A, ♠A+♦J, or some others = >61%), though I'm half expecting nothing to be learned because opps bid up to 4M before my next bid, I still start with the system bid.
billw55, on 2012-January-03, 15:12, said:
Assuming 4NT-5♥ also denies ♠A, it needs either ♣Q, ♥K or something good in ♣. 56% for the 1st two, don't think ♣ ruff or dropping is making up the gap tho...
FrancesHinden, on 2012-January-03, 15:22, said:
I thought you have a method whereby you would later be able to bid 6♣ to ask about ♣Q for a grand...?
#9
Posted 2012-January-03, 19:25
Only sensible opening to me is 4NT, sometimes I hit the jackpot and partner has two aces. Most of the time I won't get the ♥A and try 6.
When partner holds the ♥A, it's really close between 6 and 7. I'm tempted to think that holding ♥Q and ♣T might give us enough extra squeeze chances for 7 to be good bet but that is assuming defense never leads ♥ against this sequence. Thinking of it, the heart lead seems clearly best so...
One last note, even if I had some other methods for bidding the hand (strong club and relays for everything) I wouldn't do that and hope opps won't interfere. I'm really afraid of giving them any bids below 5 lvl to point towards a really good sacrifice.
#10
Posted 2012-January-03, 19:40
Flameous, on 2012-January-03, 19:25, said:
Surely makes no difference in that respect. Partner is just as likely to hold ♥Q when we have x as they are to hold ♥J when we have Q. It does however improve 2♣, for one thing opps are less likely to compete in ♥.
#11
Posted 2012-January-03, 20:21
But as I mentioned, holding Q does increase our squeeze chances a bit.
#12
Posted 2012-January-04, 14:46
whereagles, on 2012-January-03, 14:56, said:
The danger of starting with a forcing opener is that the only thing you will learn is that the opps are in 6♠.
When we are talking about explaining things to team mates. I don't like to explain how they found a cheap NV save and we had to guess whether to defend or bid 7 while our team mates had to deal with a plain simple 6♦ opening.
Rik
The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds the new discoveries, is not “Eureka!” (I found it!), but “That’s funny…” – Isaac Asimov
The only reason God did not put "Thou shalt mind thine own business" in the Ten Commandments was that He thought that it was too obvious to need stating. - Kenberg
#13
Posted 2012-January-04, 18:55
#14
Posted 2012-January-04, 19:34
Flameous, on 2012-January-03, 20:21, said:
D'oh. Yes of course. I overlooked a ♥ finesse due to not wanting to be in grand on a finesse. But the chance has to be counted, and may take us past the magic 66%, but may also depend on whether we get a trump lead (e.g. stiff ♦J in dummy).
#15
Posted 2012-January-07, 00:58
"But I don't want to go among mad people," Alice remarked.
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
#16
Posted 2012-January-07, 05:32
Yu18772, on 2012-January-07, 00:58, said:
Most probably play it as "no agreement" - to the extent that they wouldn't risk bidding it.
"Specific aces" is what I regard as standard in England, based on 1970s books on Acol.
I am sure some play it as Blackwood, and some as "both minors", and some as a good 5m bid.
"Robin Barker is a mathematician. ... All highly skilled in their respective fields and clearly accomplished bridge players."
#17
Posted 2012-January-07, 06:06
Yu18772, on 2012-January-07, 00:58, said:
N0. We play 3NT as a specific Ace ask.