hatchett, on 2011-May-22, 11:06, said:
" and even
then I have to guesswrong twice.
No
FrancesHinden, on 2011-May-22, 04:44, said:
.....and guessing spades, or finding one hand with both the KJ
Finding
♠KJ with lefty wont help either. When he is in with J, he simply tables K. So u basically end up with 2
♠+2
♦+3
♥ tricks and needing 2
♣ tricks with one move left from dummy.
CSGibson, on 2011-May-22, 22:51, said:
The popular line appears to be diamond to the ace, and diamond back. Righty started with KJx of diamonds, and pops K on the 2nd round, switching to the ♠3 after a long tank. Is there any reason to guess this one way or another?
Some defenders may table
♠ K if they have it, to kill entry for
♦ when held with
♦K, this gives a little edge to play
♠ T if RHO shifts small. That works if declarer has Qx
♠. Playing small gains when declarer has QTx
♠, with other holdings what RHO play wld be irrelevant i think. But from Jxx(x) they all would play small.
But i would personally go with one of Andy's 2nd post with an additional 3rd alternative of starting with
♦ Q ducking when covered. If RHO has stiff J or T it is jackpot, if RHO has stiff K we can still score 3
♦, if LHO has KJTx we still can score 3[diamomds]. After all LHO annoys us less than RHO when switch to
♠ and if RHO has 4
♦ the A and then to Q wont help us much anyway. Basically i wld go for 3
♦ tricks and try to score 3 black tricks. This also may cause a panic in defense and we may get a
♠ move from lefty.
Not sure which line is superior among all these posted though.