Fantunes 1D
#1
Posted 2018-May-27, 06:44
I started thinking of an idea.
Ive heard lots of good things of fantunes 1D opening, how it is the most succesful of all fantunes opening bids.
In a natural system, playing 5542 with unbalanced Diamond, what if you switch with Fantunes 1D opening, showing 14+ unbalanced, 4+ diamonds, and have a 10-13 2D opening with 5+ diamonds?
So the opening scheme should be like this:
1C: natural/11-13/17-19
1D: 14+ unbalanced, 4+ D
1H/S: 5+,
1NT: 14-16
2C: GF/20-21NT/weak D
2D: 10-13, 5+ D
2NT: 22-24
It might work really well, what you guys think?
#2
Posted 2018-May-27, 07:50
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
#5
Posted 2018-May-27, 08:29
#8
Posted 2018-May-27, 11:24
straube, on 2018-May-27, 08:34, said:
If you read what I wrote, "Fantunes style bidders open 1N with any 4441 shape hand."
You suggested a hand that appeared to be a problem hand for his system.
I merely stated a possible solution "if he decided to
follow" what Fantunes players bid with that type hand.
#9
Posted 2018-May-28, 05:50
#10
Posted 2018-May-28, 10:32
spotlight7, on 2018-May-27, 08:16, said:
I play a similar system. I'd probably hold my breath and open 1♦ - this is the only pattern where 4 pieces is OK.
Weaken the hand slightly and I would pass. Give me a stiff club honor and I would open 1♣ and pretend it's balanced.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#11
Posted 2018-May-28, 10:56
#12
Posted 2018-May-28, 21:24
I think the fantunes 2♦ opening is unplayable(The worst of all fantune twos).
#13
Posted 2018-May-29, 00:28
yunling, on 2018-May-28, 21:24, said:
A pair I know of used to do this in their Fantunes variant (which they constructed before Jacobs' book, and maybe prior to Dan's notes too). They now used the 2♦ opening as 10-13 with both majors (intermediate Ekren). This meant that their 1M openings promised 14+.
#14
Posted 2018-May-29, 03:50
So my 1♦ opening doesn't almost guarantee 5+ D, but can also be made with "1445 minus 1 card" (specifically, with 10-15 and either 0445, 1345 or 1435, and with 11-16 and 1444). Superficially, this means that the opening can't be raised as aggressively. But note that if Opener doesn't have either 5+ D or 4441, he will always have 5+ C. So although he can no longer raise 1♦ to 3 with 4-card support only, it's possible to play
1♦-(P/X/1M)-?:
(...)
2N = bad PRE D "raise" with either 5+ D or 4D3+C
3♣ = good PRE D "raise" with 4D3+C
3♦ = good PRE D raise with 5+ D
(...),
where 2N and 3♣ allow the partnership to play in a 5-3 C fit instead of a 4-3 D fit.
#15
Posted 2018-June-06, 02:37
In my opinion any hand with 12-13 HCP could be open-bid 1NT ..either balanced or offshape as long as there is no -5card major in it (5431, 5422 and 4441)...
with 14 HCP unbalanced there would be no problem about open-bidding 1-level suit anyway..